Sugerencias
Idioma
Guía para autores
Buscador
Información de la revista
Vol. 50. Núm. 4.
(Abril 2026)
Cita
Cita
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1074
Vol. 50. Núm. 4.
(Abril 2026)
Update In intensive care medicine: Pediatric intensive care
Acceso a texto completo

Pediatric trauma: Where are we and where are we heading? A narrative review of recent evidence

Traumatismo pediátrico, ¿dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos? Revisión narrativa de la evidencia reciente
Visitas
1074
Luis Renter Valdovinosa, Ander Ceña Setienb, Javier Rodríguez-Fanjulc, Jesús Abelardo Barea-Mendozad,
Autor para correspondencia
a Servei de Medicina Pediàtrica, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
b Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
c Unitat de Cures Intensives Pediàtriques, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
d UCI de Trauma y Emergencias, Servicio Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
fig0005
fig0010
Tablas (6)
Table 1. Physiological and anatomical characteristics of the child.
Tablas
Table 2. Pediatric trauma index.
Tablas
Table 3. Resources required for pediatric trauma center recognition as proposed by the American College of Surgeons Trauma Committee.8
Tablas
Table 4. Heart rate and blood pressure. Ranges in pediatrics.
Tablas
Table 5. Neuromonitoring of the patient with traumatic brain injury.
Tablas
Table 6. Recent evidence in pediatric trauma.
Tablas
Material adicional (1)
Abstract

Trauma is the leading cause of death in children and adolescents. This article reviews recent advances in the management of severe pediatric trauma, emphasizing the importance of well-organized trauma systems, effective triage, and protocols specifically adapted to pediatric physiology. Current strategies for damage-control resuscitation are discussed, including the use of blood products, vasoactive support, and novel predictive indices for shock severity. In traumatic brain injury, the role of multimodal neuromonitoring and individualized management of intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures is reviewed. The need to move beyond adult-centered approaches and tailor care to pediatric-specific characteristics is strongly emphasized. Finally, the main research priorities in pediatric trauma are outlined, which are essential for improving survival and functional recovery in this vulnerable population.

Keywords:
Pediatrics
Pediatric critical care
Trauma systems
Severe trauma
Head trauma
Resumen

El trauma es la principal causa de muerte en niños y adolescentes. El presente artículo revisa los avances recientes en la atención al trauma pediátrico grave, destacando la importancia de sistemas de trauma bien organizados, triaje efectivo y protocolos específicos adaptados a la fisiología infantil. Se analizan las estrategias actuales de resucitación con control de daños, incluyendo el uso de hemoderivados, soporte vasoactivo y nuevos scores de predicción de shock. En el traumatismo craneoencefálico, se revisa el papel de la neuromonitorización multimodal así como la gestión individualizada de la presión intracraneal y la presión de perfusión cerebral. Se enfatiza la necesidad de adaptar los cuidados a las particularidades pediátricas, alejándose de modelos exclusivamente derivados de adultos. Finalmente, se presentan las principales líneas de investigación en trauma pediátrico, fundamentales para mejorar la supervivencia y la recuperación funcional de los pacientes.

Palabras clave:
Pediatría
Cuidados intensivos pediátricos
Sistemas de trauma
Trauma grave
Trauma craneal
Texto completo
Introduction

External causes (non-natural or violent causes, including accidents, suicides, and assaults) are now the leading cause of death among 1- to 19-year-olds, accounting for 34% of all deaths in 2023.1 These injuries have physical, psychological, and emotional sequelae that affect the quality of life of the children and their families.2 Part of this mortality is potentially avoidable through rapid, standardized healthcare adapted to children’s anatomical and physiological particularities (Table 1).3 It is important to remember that children are not miniature adults. Their characteristics determine the types and severity of injuries they sustain and the therapeutic approaches required. Additionally, adolescents have unique characteristics in terms of injury mechanisms, such as traffic accidents or assaults, as well as anatomical differences, including a high frequency of injuries to the torso, pelvis, and extremities.4 This makes it necessary to be aware of certain lesions that are more typical of adult patients, such as cerebrovascular and pelvic injuries.5,6 Pediatric trauma care should be based on rigorous protocols and integrated into a trauma system that addresses all stages of care. The present review discusses the most current recommendations in light of the scientific evidence and the peculiarities of this patient population.

Table 1.

Physiological and anatomical characteristics of the child.

Characteristic  Consequence 
Increased vagal tone  → Tendency towards bradycardia at laryngoscopy 
Compensation in event of bleeding  → Hypotension only in advanced stages 
Lower functional residual capacity  → Early hypoxia 
Increased oxygen demand   
Greater surface/weight ratio  → Increased heat loss 
Smaller size  → More energy per unit surface area 
Wide range of sizes and weights  → Drug according to ideal weight 
  → Devices according to size 
Helplessness and inability to communicate→ Non-accidental or inadvertent injuries 
→ Presence of parents 
  → Tendency towards TBI and scalp bleeding 
Greater cephalic proportion  → Brain injuries caused by deceleration 
Weakness of cervical structures  → SCIWORA and DAI lesions 
Open fontanelles (<6−12 months)  → Increased tolerance of intracranial hypertension 
Tongue-mouth disproportion  → Different axial alignment 
Lymphoid tissue hypertrophy  → Preparation for intubation 
More higher and anterior larynx  → Lesser field of view 
Short, narrow and collapsible trachea  → Ease of selective intubation and inadvertent extubation 
Elastic rib cage-ribs  → Internal injuries without fractures 
More mobile mediastinum  → Propensity towards greater involvement in presence of pneumothorax or hemothorax 
Smaller and more flexible ribs  → Increase in abdominal injuries 
Pelvis with lesser capacity   
Less developed musculature   

DAI: diffuse axonal injury; SCIWORA: spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality; TBI: traumatic brain injury.

Trauma care systems and codes in pediatricsOrganization of pediatric trauma care systems

Trauma systems (TS) are a multidisciplinary, transverse approach to trauma patient care. They include accident prevention, prehospital care, transfer to useful centers, and rehabilitation. Although the definitions vary, with regard to trauma, a useful center is understood to have the human, technical and structural resources necessary to provide comprehensive and continuous care for severely traumatized patients. Due to the specific needs of pediatric patients, a specialized system is needed that incorporates all healthcare providers who can attend to them. This system can be integrated into any TS and adjusted according to the epidemiology and available resources.7 This approach requires the integration of all hospital centers together with the emergency systems, through unified care protocols and referral criteria, as well as specialized training programs. When properly structured, a TS optimizes resources, correlates each patient’s needs with each center’s characteristics, and promotes equitable and efficient care.8

Categorization of the trauma patient. Severity scales in pediatrics

The categorization of trauma patients as a process of victim selection according to treatment needs and transfer priority can be carried out by means of severity indices. These indices are mostly designed to indicate referral to higher-level centers for the most severely ill patients. These indices should be simple, validated, and practical. Although they standardize prehospital assessment, they have limitations and should be combined with clinical judgment.9

Pediatric trauma score

The pediatric trauma score (PTS) was designed as a triage tool to be used in prehospital care based on the anatomical and physiological nature of the injuries. It was created as a specifically pediatric index, and the score is linked to the patient's need for transfer to a trauma center (TC) (Table 2). The PTS is a simple and easy-to-apply scale that includes 6 components: 3 anatomical and 3 functional. The score ranges from -6 points (maximum severity) to +12 points (minimum severity).10

Table 2.

Pediatric trauma index.

ITEM  Category
  +2  +1  −1 
Weight (kg)  >20  10−20  <10 
Airway  Normal  Stable  Unstable 
CNS  Awake  Diminished consciousness  Comatose 
SBP (mm Hg)  >90  50−90  <50 
Wound(s)  None  Minor  Major or penetrating 
Fracture(s)  None  Closed  Open or multiple 

If score is ≤ 8 points: refer to trauma center.

CNS: central nervous system; SBP: systolic blood pressure.

More than three decades ago, the predictive validity of the PTS was assessed, presenting a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 98.6% for predicting mortality with a score ≤ 8. It is also associated with a high weight of evidence: WoE(+) = 18.3 and WoE(−) = −13.7.11 Thus, practically all patients with scores > 8 survive, and mortality progressively increases below this figure, indicating transfer to a TC. Its simplicity and validity have made it the most widely used tool in pediatrics. Recent studies have confirmed its high discriminatory power.12

Pediatric trauma codes. Activation and criteria

The "trauma code" is a system designed to coordinate the care for severe trauma patients by integrating the different responsible parties through communication and specific protocols for triage, destination selection, transfer, and team activation. The TC’s main objective is to ensure that each trauma patient receives care at the most appropriate center. In this regard, the prehospital activation criteria, in addition to the severity indices, are useful for this purpose. When well-defined, they minimize both undertriage (serious patients referred to non-specialized centers, with a target rate of less than 5%) and overtriage (transfer of non-serious patients to higher-level centers, with a target of less than 35%).13 Periodically updated since 1976, prehospital triage guidelines have evolved to improve their applicability and decrease under- and overtriage rates. The latest 2021 update simplifies the activation criteria into two risk categories (Appendix B Table 1 of the Supplementary material) and includes the pediatric age group. This update is adaptable to the healthcare reality of the TS.14

Pediatric trauma centers

Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs), created in the 1970s and 1980s, should provide leadership in pediatric trauma care in their territories through their own programs and research. They should also provide definitive care for the most severe cases and support to less specialized centers. The American College of Surgeons defines the resources needed by PTCs to maintain the competence of their teams (Table 3). Their number and location should be adapted to the population and needs of each territory. Several reviews have shown better outcomes for adults treated in TC. Although the evidence is not definitive, recommendations state that pediatric trauma care should also be provided in PTCs.8,15,16 A review published in 2023, including 34 studies and over 200,000 patients, reported a 40% reduction in mortality for patients under 16 years of age seen in PTCs, with a reduced use of computed tomography (CT) and less solid organ surgery.17 Other variables that could improve PTC care, such as the preservation of functionality,18 should also be considered.

Table 3.

Resources required for pediatric trauma center recognition as proposed by the American College of Surgeons Trauma Committee.8

→ Pediatric traumatology and orthopedics   
→ Pediatric surgery (at least 2 of physical presence in level I).   
→ Pediatric emergencies   
→ Pediatric intensive care unit   
→ Radiology available, with protocols adapted to age and weight. Availability of interventional radiology   
→ Other specialties with pediatric experience (neurosurgery or anesthesiology)   
→ Pediatric rehabilitation service   
→ Pediatric resuscitation equipment in all areas of care   
→ Child protection services. Social work   
→ Capacity in child abuse assistance   
→ Other: pediatric trauma program supervisor, development of injury prevention plans, research and training in pediatric trauma   
LEVEL I:  LEVEL II: >100 trauma admissions/year
>200 trauma admissions/year 
Initial pediatric trauma care

The sequence of care is reviewed, and the main novelties are introduced. It should be noted that the current recommendations are mostly based on low-quality evidence or expert consensus.19

Primary assessment

The aim is to identify and treat life-threatening conditions, rule out near-fatal risk injuries (NFRIs), and prevent secondary injuries.20

Pediatric assessment triangle

We will get a first impression by observing the following: 1) general appearance; 2) respiratory effort; and 3) peripheral perfusion, as well as obvious lesions and bleeding.21

ABCDE sequence

The ABCDE sequence is recommended over C-ABCDE, unless massive hemorrhage is suspected.22

  • A

    Alertness-airway control-definitive cervical control

After determining whether the patient is conscious, presents diminished consciousness, or is comatose, the airway is evaluated. If endotracheal intubation is required, sedoanalgesia increases the risk of hemodynamic collapse and cardiorespiratory arrest (CRA). Administering volume and using ketamine as the sedoanalgesic of first choice (0.5−1 mg/kg in the presence of hemodynamic instability) is advisable, since ketamine produces less cardiovascular and respiratory depression when used with a neuromuscular blocker in a rapid induction sequence. For very unstable patients, intubation can be performed while maintaining spontaneous breathing with ketamine alone (without neuromuscular blockade).23 Atropine is only indicated if reflex bradycardia occurs in response to stimulation during laryngoscopy, which is more common in children. Cuffed tubes are currently the first choice at any age. Devices for difficult airway management, such as videolaryngoscopy, Frova-type introducers, and laryngeal masks, are available for all ages.24 In the "non-intubable, non-ventilatable" scenario, there are no percutaneous devices for children under 5 years of age; therefore, angiocatheters must be used in these cases. For patients between 5 and 10 years of age, such devices are available, but they have a narrow caliber that only allows oxygenation.25 Cervical control is preferably manual, as it is more comfortable, although the indications are increasingly restrictive (Appendix B Table 2 of the Supplementary material).

  • B

    Ventilation and oxygenation

The FiO2 required to achieve target saturations of 93–97% is administered to avoid hyperoxia. The smallest self-inflating bag (250 ml) should be excluded. It is essential to observe correct thoracic excursion and to auscultate good air entry. The tidal volume administered in invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) should be 6−8 ml/kg of ideal body weight to achieve normal ventilation. Despite its variable correlation with arterial pCO2, capnography is useful. Among the possible NFRIs, tension or open pneumothorax, massive hemothorax, flail chest, and pulmonary contusion should be mentioned.26 Thoracic drainage is performed in the fourth or fifth intercostal space (mid- and anterior axillary line) or the second space on the midclavicular line. In cases of CRA, thoracotomy should be considered, especially for penetrating trauma, provided that experienced personnel are available.27,28

  • C

    Evaluation of circulation and bleeding

The hemodynamic situation is evaluated based on the heart rate, arterial pressure, perfusion, and other factors. The evaluation should include a diagnosis of the source of the hemorrhage. Although resuscitation will be discussed in depth later (in the "Hemorrhagic shock" section), it is important to note that venous access should be established within the first five minutes (the peripheral route in the antecubital fossa being the preferred choice). There are different types of shock: hypovolemic-hemorrhagic (the most common type, which will be discussed below), obstructive (pneumothorax or cardiac tamponade), distributive, and cardiogenic (due to thoracic contusion or electrocution). Traumatic shock is described as a dynamic combination of these mechanisms. For cardiac tamponade, the safest approach is the echo-assisted anterior intercostal approach.29 In CRA, reversible causes should be treated immediately, even before adrenaline is administered, and in parallel with compressions.28

  • D

    Neurological deficit

Neurological deficits are assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), which has been adapted for children under 2–3 years of age (Appendix B Table 3 of the Supplementary material). A motor GCS score of less than 4 implies loss of airway protection.27 Seizures in the early hours after traumatic brain injury (TBI) can occur without intracranial damage.30 They should be treated with benzodiazepines and, unless they persist, should not result in intubation. Pain and agitation should be treated aggressively, and non-pharmacological measures should be considered (e.g., presence of parents, toys, or videos). An NFRI is characterized by endocranial hypertension, pupillary abnormality, and bradycardia. The appearance of an erythematous rash on the upper part of the body is infrequent but characteristic.31 Hyperosmolar therapy with hypertonic saline (2−5 ml/kg at a concentration of 3% in 10−20 min) can be used for immediate treatment during crises. At present, the use of hypertonic saline is preferable to avoid the osmotic diuresis of mannitol. Hyperventilation is limited to a rescue maneuver until definitive measures are put in place.32

  • E

    Exposure and prevention of hypothermia

The patient should be exposed to proactively look for external injuries and then be quickly covered again. The temperature should be determined, and the patient should be actively warmed in case of hypothermia (temperature < 35 °C).33

Other considerations

Ultrasound is included in the primary examination because it allows for the detection of some NFRIs (E-FAST).34 It must be performed without delaying the rest of the actions. A secondary evaluation begins once the patient is in a more stable condition. It includes a directed history and physical examination as well as complementary tests, such as blood and urine tests (including toxins) and imaging procedures (Appendix B Table 4 of the Supplementary material). Since children are more sensitive due to their developing tissues and have a longer life expectancy, radiation exposure for diagnostic purposes should be kept to a minimum. Liberal use of radiation exposure does not improve outcomes in stable patients and is associated with overdiagnosis and longer hospital stays. Restrictive but consensus-based protocols should be promoted.35

Hemorrhagic shock

Hemorrhagic shock is the leading cause of preventable mortality in pediatric trauma, surpassing the mortality rate observed in adults (36% versus 20–25%).36 Early identification and control are essential in this regard.

Pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock in children

The increase in systemic vascular resistance maintains blood pressure up to blood loss volumes of 30–40%. Hypotension is a late sign ("decompensated shock").3 The first sign is tachycardia. Heart rate and blood pressure have wide normal ranges depending on age (Table 4).27 Slowing of capillary refill results in a mottled, cold appearance of the most distal parts of the body. “Pseudo-compromise“, a similar clinical situation caused by fear, pain, cold, or post-critical state,20 should be ruled out.

Table 4.

Heart rate and blood pressure. Ranges in pediatrics.

Age    1 month  1 year  5 years  10 years 
HR  Limits  110−180  100−170  70−140  60−120 
p50  SBP  75  95  100  110 
  MBP  55  70  75  75 
p5  SBP  50  70  75  80 
  MBP  40  50  55  55 

HR: heart rate; MAP: mean arterial blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure. Approximation (1–10 years): SBP: p50 = 90 + age (years) × 2, p5 = 70 + age (years).

Resuscitation strategy

Damage control resuscitation is the strategy of choice, the salient elements of which are37:

  • Recognize bleeding.

  • Determine the need for a transfusion.

  • Establish vascular access.

  • Administer blood products.

  • Avoid hemodilution, acidosis, hypocalcemia, and hypothermia.

  • Rapid control of the source of the hemorrhage.

Vascular access

Establishing a vascular access in pediatric patients with vasoconstriction can be complicated. Peripheral access should be achieved within 5 min (60 s in CRA) or within two attempts in accessible areas and with the largest possible caliber. The most recommended locations are the antecubital fossa and saphenous route.38 Intraosseous access is the first alternative and may be the primary option if difficulty is anticipated. It is easy to place and can be performed in the proximal tibia (most frequently), with alternatives being the proximal humerus (in larger patients) and the distal femur.39

Volume and blood products

Ideally, no more than 20 ml/kg of crystalloids should be administered; excess administration is associated with a poorer course.40 Blood products should be prioritized, even in an out-of-hospital setting. The preferred ratio of red blood cell concentrates, plasma, and platelets is close to 1:1:1.41 The transfusion of group O whole blood with low titers of anti-A and anti-B IgG (LTOWB: Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood) has been proposed as a safe and fast alternative. However, further studies are needed to demonstrate its superiority.42

Vasoactive support

If hypotension persists despite volume resuscitation, vasoactive support should be administered. Noradrenaline is the drug of choice despite scarce supporting evidence.43 In cases of cardiac dysfunction, adrenaline or dobutamine should be considered. These drugs can be administered conveniently diluted via the peripheral route.44

Clinical indicators and shock parameters

The goal of permissive hypotension in cases of uncontrolled bleeding is to administer the least amount of volume possible until the bleeding is controlled. If there is no central nervous system (CNS) involvement, a minimum blood pressure should be maintained at p5; if there is CNS involvement, it should reach at least p50. The chosen resuscitation target should be the minimum needed to ensure adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen supply.45 The Shock Index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) is an early indicator that identifies patients at a higher risk for severe hemorrhaging and the need for intervention. In pediatrics, the Shock Index, Pediatric Age-Adjusted, is more appropriate. The reference values are: 1.22 for ages 4–6, 1 for ages 7–12, and 0.9 for ages 13–16 years.46 Less widespread and validated are the reverse shock index multiplied by the GCS and the ABC-D, which includes lactate and base excess (BE), though with promising results.47,48 Lactate, BE, and hemoglobin evolution over time are also useful.

Massive transfusion in pediatrics and goal-directed therapy

There is no consensus on the definition and activation criteria for massive transfusion. These criteria must be simple to ensure timely and rapid access to blood products.49 The most widely accepted criteria are:

  • Transfusion of 40 ml/kg or 2 units of packed blood red cells (1–24 h).

  • Rapid and uncontrolled blood loss.

  • Estimated volume loss ≥ 40% of total blood volume or 40 ml/kg.50

Activation is often triggered by clinical manifestations of shock, a compatible injury mechanism, and significant bleeding. This is followed by targeted guidance and viscoelastic testing.45 It is advisable to determine prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and platelets. A prothrombin ratio > 1.5 is considered indicative of severe coagulopathy. Desirable levels are: hemoglobin between 7−9 g/dl and platelets > 50 × 109/l (> 100 × 109/l in the event of central nervous system bleeding). As mentioned in the "Volume and blood products" section, transfusions should be balanced with ratios close to 1:1:1. It is necessary to monitor ionic calcium levels and to supplement them if found to be low.33,41 In the event of severe bleeding, the empirical administration of tranexamic acid is recommended within the first three hours (15 mg/kg and infusion).51 Fibrinogen or cryoprecipitates are indicated in cases of hypofibrinogenemia (<150 mg/dl) or a compatible result in viscoelastic tests.33,45

Non-operative management strategy and damage control surgery

The previously described measures are temporary until the bleeding is controlled. Non-operative management is the standard approach for patients with isolated solid organ injuries. However, patients with bleeding and instability despite volume resuscitation, or with rebleeding, require angioembolization or surgery. Embolization may reduce the need for surgery in pediatric patients with signs of persistent active bleeding.52 Finding contrast extravasation on a CT scan in a hemodynamically stable patient is not an indication for embolization.53 For patients who do not respond to the initial measures, even temporarily, damage control surgery should be considered. For complex cases, a multidisciplinary decision-making process is recommended, taking into account the lesions, the resuscitation specialist’s opinion, and the feasibility of transferring to a CT scan or intervention, as well as the need for emergent surgery.54,55

Care of head injuries

TBI remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in children, with an incidence of 134 per 100,000 person-years.56 The main aspects of care for children with TBI will be reviewed, with special emphasis on neuromonitoring (Table 5).

Table 5.

Neuromonitoring of the patient with traumatic brain injury.

Method  Physiological parameter  Reference values  Advantages  Limitations 
ICPp57Intracranial pressure<20 mm HgContinuous  Invasive
Easy to insert 
<15 mm Hg (DC)  Few complications  Location dependent 
EVDIntracranial pressure<20 mm HgContinuous  Invasive 
Global value  Technical difficulty 
<15 mm Hg (DC)  CSF drainage  Infection and bleeding 
PTiO258Tissue oxygen pressureChildren  ContinuousInvasive 
>10 mm Hg  Probe position 
Adults  Good temporary resolutionPoor spatial resolution
>25 mm Hg 
Automated pupillometry59Brainstem reflexes (pupil size and reactivity)NPi > 3Noninvasive  Limited evidence
Objectives 
OND60ICPUnder 1 year: 5 mmNoninvasive  Operator dependent 
Bedside  Variable results 
Over 1 year: 6 mm  Predicts ICP increase  Temporary resolution 
NIRS61Regional cerebral oxygenationNo absolute value  NoninvasivePoor correlation if hematoma is present 
Assess trend, asymmetry and abrupt changes  Extracranial contamination 
Transcranial Doppler62Mean cerebral blood flow velocityPulsatility index > 1.2Noninvasive  Operator dependent 
Multiple aspects:  Intermittent
CA, vasospasm, and ICP estimation 
EEGc63Brain base activity  Noninvasive and continuous  Sedation may affect interpretation 
Seizure activityQuantitative and qualitative assessment  Resource intensive
Prognosis 
Cerebral microdialysis64GlucoseGlucose 1−2.5 mmol/lMetabolic couplingInvasive and requires resources 
Intermittent 
Brain lactate/pyruvate (LP)LP: < 25 (ideally < 20)Metabolic stress and energy failureFocal measures 
Research setting 

CA: cerebral autoregulation; DC: decompressive craniectomy; OND: optic nerve sheath diameter; EVD: external ventricular drainage; EEGc: continuous electroencephalogram; NIRS: near-infrared spectroscopy; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; ICPp: intraparenchymal intracranial pressure; CPP: cerebral perfusion pressure; PTiO2: tissue oxygen pressure.

Adapted from Agrawal et al.65.

NeuromonitoringNeurological examination

The initial clinical examination is essential to classify and establish a prognosis. Thus, a motor GCS ≤ 3 is strongly predictive of a poor prognosis.66 Anisocoria is suggestive of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and uncal herniation, requiring urgent treatment. Bilateral mydriasis is associated with high mortality. Automated pupillometry provides greater precision, and some of the derived indices may be of prognostic value.59

Intracranial pressure

ICP is the pressure exerted by the sum of the intracranial volumes (parenchymal tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid). An increased intracranial volume that overcomes compensatory mechanisms (decreased compliance) can raise ICP, leading to cerebral compression, ischemia, herniation, and death. There are different methods available for measuring ICP; each method has different advantages and limitations (Table 5).67 ICP monitoring should be performed in patients with severe TBI (GCS ≤ 8) and injuries identified by brain CT (e.g., hematomas, contusions, swelling, herniation, or basal cistern compressions). Monitoring is also indicated in severe TBI without lesions, but with evidence in the examination of unilateral or bilateral decorticate posturing or arterial hypotension. Finally, ICP monitoring is also indicated in severe polytrauma and TBI when correct neurological monitoring is impossible due to other reasons, such as lung injury or hemodynamic instability. For patients without clear indications (e.g., moderate TBI with risk injuries), or in the early stages of care, noninvasive techniques (e.g., optic nerve sheath diameter or Doppler ultrasound) may be useful for follow-up and making decisions about invasive monitoring. In patients undergoing invasive monitoring, these techniques remain relevant, as they provide supplementary information.68

Cerebral perfusion pressure

ICP monitoring allows the calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP): CPP = mean arterial pressure (MAP)-ICP. Clinicians can act on CPP by lowering ICP, increasing MAP, or both. It is important to adjust the CPP target according to patient age: under 2 years > 45 mm Hg, between 2–8 years > 60 mm Hg, and over 8 years > 70 mm Hg.69

Multimodal neuromonitoringCerebral flow and autoregulation

There is a consensus that complementary parameters, such as autoregulation, oxygenation, and cerebral metabolism, should be incorporated alongside ICP. Loss of cerebral autoregulation (CA) is common after TBI, which makes the brain more vulnerable. Management guided by fixed CPP targets is insufficient. For example, loss of CA increases the risk of cerebral edema. Conversely, patients with preserved CA may benefit from higher CPP, which decreases ICP.70 CA assessment is based primarily on the reactivity index (PRx). This is a moving correlation coefficient between spontaneous slow wave changes between MAP and ICP during a 5-min window. PRx can take values from −1 to +1. Negative values represent an inverse relationship and intact CA, indicating a better clinical outcome, whereas positive values indicate altered CA.71 By constructing the CPP-PRx curve, one can calculate the optimal CPP, which is the area of the curve that makes PRx more negative. This curve also allows for the treatment of endocranial hypertension by increasing CPP, provided that CA is preserved (PRx < 0). Though evidence is limited in children, pending trials, there are promising results in adults.65 Transcranial Doppler ultrasound measures cerebral blood flow velocity and is used to calculate the pulsatility index to estimate ICP and CPP. In pediatrics, a good correlation has been described in the determination of CPP, although the evidence on the usefulness of the formulas for estimating ICP is not conclusive.62

Oxygenation and metabolism

Cerebral oximetry with near-infrared spectroscopy provides information on global oxygenation in all the vascular compartments. While the absolute value has not been shown to be useful, changes over time may help in monitoring cerebral perfusion.61 Cerebral tissue oxygenation (PTiO2) and cerebral microdialysis provide information on perfusion and cellular metabolism. PTiO2 helps prevent tissue hypoxia and adjust therapies to lower ICP. In pediatrics, values < 10−20 mm Hg are associated with ischemia and a poorer prognosis.58 Microdialysis allows for the analysis of brain metabolites such as glucose and lactate/pyruvate, which serve as indicators of ischemia or mitochondrial dysfunction.72

General management according to current evidence (Pediatric TBrain trauma Foundation guidelines)

Figs. 1 and 2 propose treatment schemes in accordance with the Brain trauma Foundation’s algorithms for managing severe pediatric TBI.73Fig. 1 includes the basic measures, such as securing the airway, sedation, and maintaining homeostasis. A cranial CT scan is essential to rule out lesions requiring urgent surgery. If not, then ICP monitoring is indicated. Cerebral herniation may occur at any time, during initial resuscitation or in the context of refractory intracranial hypertension. Treatment is emergent, regardless of the ICP value. Treatment includes hyperventilation, osmotherapy (with hypertonic saline preferred, due to the lower risk of osmotic diuresis), increased MAP, or opening of the external intraventricular drainage. Apart from targeting an ICP < 20 mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg in decompressive craniectomies, it is important to have a CPP > 40 mm Hg in young children and > 50 mm Hg in adolescents, using PRx as a help to obtain the ideal value. If, despite the first-level measures, the patient persists with intracranial hypertension, a decompressive craniectomy may be considered (Fig. 2). Medical interventions may include barbiturate-induced coma, moderate hypothermia, and hyperventilation with CO2 levels of 28−34 mm Hg while monitoring for ischemia (cerebral oxygenation monitoring). In summary, all the information must be considered, and guidelines must be implemented according to the patient's context and response.

Figure 1.

First-line treatment algorithm for severe traumatic brain injury in pediatrics.

EVD: external ventricular drainage; EEG: electroencephalogram; GCS: Glasgow Coma Score; Hb: hemoglobin; OTI: orotracheal intubation; PI: pulsatility index; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; MMN: multimodal neuromonitoring; PaCO2: arterial carbon dioxide pressure; PaO2: arterial oxygen pressure; ICP: intracranial pressure; PRx: pressure reactivity index; TBI: traumatic brain injury.

a Target cerebral perfusion pressure according to age: under 2 years > 45 mm Hg, between 2–8 years > 60 mm Hg, and over 8 years > 70 mm Hg.

Figure 2.

Second-line treatment algorithm for severe traumatic brain injury in pediatrics.

OND: optic nerve diameter; EEG: electroencephalogram; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; NIRS: near-infrared spectroscopy; ORx: oxygen reactivity index; PRx: pressure reactivity index; PtiO2: tissue oxygen pressure; RAP: cerebrovascular compensatory reserve.

Recent advances and areas of uncertainty

There have been relevant advances in the management of pediatric trauma in recent years (Table 6), though substantial knowledge gaps remain. Some recent proposals and priority lines of development are summarized below.

Table 6.

Recent evidence in pediatric trauma.

Aspect  Expected impact  Type of study  Author, year 
Use of checklists for pediatric trauma centersImproved outcomesCohort study  Melhado et al.75; 2024 
Delphi consensus  Gómez et al.76; 2024 
Standardization of the FAST protocol in pediatrics  Increased reproducibility  Delphi consensus  Kornblith et al.78; 2022 
Efficacy of tranexamic acid  Improved outcomes  Cohort study  Hamele et al.51; 2020 
Effect of transfusion ratios  Improved outcomes  Cohort study  Spinella et al.41; 2022 
Use of whole blood  Exploratory results  Systematic review  Park et al.42; 2025 
Management of solid organ trauma  Improved quality of care  Clinical practice guideline (American Society of Pediatric Surgery)  Williams et al.55; 2023 
Post-trauma seizure prophylaxis  Exploratory results  Cohort study  Bell et al.80; 2017 

In the prehospital and triage setting, recent publications have proposed a version of the Pediatric Trauma Injury Severity Score.12 Models adapted to low-resource settings, such as the Pediatric Resuscitation and Trauma Outcome, could also be useful.74 It is noteworthy that some centers use checklists that include the availability of personnel, equipment, and protocols. This practice has been associated with lower mortality in the first year, provided there is high compliance.75 Similarly, a Spanish group proposes using checklists during initial management to improve the quality of care.76

One possible organizational improvement is the development of trauma systems (TS) in our setting. Currently, Spain lacks a coordinated strategy to promote the development of TS for both the pediatric and adult populations. Some regions (Autonomous Communities) have made progress in creating "trauma codes", which include criteria for hospital referral and categorization. However, these experiences are heterogeneous and of limited application. The health agencies must promote the implementation of an integrated plan in all territories that includes training, research, and registries.77

Regarding initial care and resuscitation, ultrasound has been progressively incorporated. However, its usefulness in pediatrics is limited. Recent consensuses have been proposed to improve standardization and facilitate incorporation of the technique.78 There has also been an increase in the use of endovascular techniques. Despite positive results, these techniques are not widely used, so integrating them into local protocols is recommended. In the management of shock, the use of blood products and blood components stands out (Table 6). It should be noted that most of the evidence is observational or has been extrapolated from adults, thus highlighting the need for more specific research.37 To this end, multidisciplinary registries may be useful in improving clinical care and promoting research.79

Regarding TBI, mention should be made of the development of the Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI Cohort, which includes 1000 patients with head injuries, and has produced several recent publications that have contributed to the current state of the evidence80 (Table 6).

Conclusions

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in children, requiring care adapted to their unique needs. Implementing integrated trauma systems with code deployment is essential for improving outcomes. Resuscitation strategies should focus on early shock identification and the rational use of blood products, though evidence is still emerging. In TBI, advanced neuromonitoring allows for more precise management and associated prognostic improvements. Further research is needed in pediatric trauma and the development of registries.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

Such use has been made to correct typographical and spelling errors, not for the generation of content.

All authors have contributed to this manuscript and have given their approval.

Financial support

This project has received no financial support.

Declaration of competing interest

None of relevance.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

Icono mmc1.doc

References
[1]
Instituto Nacional de Estadística [Accessed September 2025]. Available from: https://ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176780&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735573175; 2025.
[2]
H.S. Futch, S.H. Newman, A.C. Onyewuenyi, M.G. Mulugeta, L.S. Blackwell, M.S. Verma, et al.
Special pediatric considerations in the management of severe traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury.
Neurosurg Clin N Am, 36 (2025), pp. 333-341
[3]
A.C. Greene, M. Shpigel, S.P. Sandifer, S.D. Safford.
Pediatric trauma—not just little adults—part 1: differences in physiology and injury patterns.
Curr Surg Rep, 12 (2024), pp. 186-195
[4]
M.C. Ciorba, M. Maegele.
Polytrauma in children—epidemiology, acute diagnostic evaluation, and treatment.
Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 121 (2024), pp. 291-297
[5]
M.M. Galardi, J.M. Strahle, A. Skidmore, A.P. Kansagra, K.P. Guilliams.
Cerebrovascular complications of pediatric blunt trauma.
Pediatr Neurol, 108 (2020), pp. 5-12
[6]
D. Galos, T.A. Doering.
High-energy fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum in pediatric patients.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 28 (2020), pp. 353-362
[7]
Committe On Pediatric Eemergency Medicine.
Management of pediatric trauma.
[8]
Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons.
[9]
C.J. Allen, A.E. Wagenaar, D.B. Horkan, D.J. Baldor, W.M. Hannay, J. Tashiro, et al.
Predictors of mortality in pediatric trauma: experiences of a level 1 trauma center and an assessment of the International Classification Injury Severity Score (ICISS).
Pediatr Surg Int, 32 (2016), pp. 657-663
[10]
J.J. Tepas, D.L. Mollitt, J.L. Talbert, M. Bryant.
The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity in the injured child.
J Pediatr Surg, 22 (1987), pp. 14-18
[11]
M.L. Ramenofsky, M.B. Ramenofsky, G.J. Jurkovich, D. Threadgill, B.H. Dierking, R.W. Powell.
The predictive validity of the Pediatric Trauma Score.
J Trauma, 28 (1988), pp. 1038-1042
[12]
A. De Los Ríos-Pérez, A. García, L. Cuello, S. Rebolledo, A. Fandiño-Losada.
Performance of the Paediatric Trauma Score on survival prediction of injured children at a major trauma centre: A retrospective Colombian cohort, 2011–2019.
Lancet Reg Health, 13 (2022),
[13]
B. Eithun, A. Gosain.
Multidisciplinary approach to decrease pediatric trauma undertriage.
J Surg Res, 205 (2016), pp. 482-489
[14]
C.D. Newgard, P.E. Fischer, M. Gestring, H.N. Michaels, G.J. Jurkovich, E.B. Lerner, et al.
National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 93 (2022), pp. e49-e60
[15]
C. Sathya, A.S. Alali, P.W. Wales, D.C. Scales, P.J. Karanicolas, R.S. Burd, et al.
Mortality among injured children treated at different trauma center types.
JAMA Surg, 150 (2015), pp. 874-881
[16]
M. Khalil, G. Alawwa, F. Pinto, P.A. O’Neill.
Pediatric mortality at pediatric versus adult trauma centers.
J Emerg Trauma Shock, 14 (2021), pp. 128-135
[17]
L. Moore, G. Freire, A.F. Turgeon, M. Bérubé, K.M. Boukar, P.A. Tardif, et al.
Pediatric vs adult or mixed trauma centers in children admitted to hospitals following trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Netw Open, 6 (2023),
[18]
S. Miyata, J. Cho, O. Lebedevskiy, K. Matsushima, E. Bae, D.W. Bliss.
Trauma experts versus pediatric experts: comparison of outcomes in pediatric penetrating injuries.
J Surg Res, 208 (2017), pp. 173-179
[19]
G.C. Freire, S. Beno, N. Yanchar, M. Weiss, A. Stang, T. Stelfox, et al.
Clinical practice guideline recommendations for pediatric multisystem trauma care: a systematic review.
Ann Surg, 278 (2023), pp. 858-864
[20]
P. Domínguez Sampedro, S. Cañadas Palazón, N. de Lucas García, J. Balcells Ramírez, V. Martínez Ibáñez.
Asistencia inicial al traumatismo pediátrico y reanimación cardiopulmonar.
An Pediatría, 65 (2006), pp. 586-606
[21]
F.J. Travería Casanova, G. Alonso Fernández, M. Olivé Cavero, P. Domínguez Sampedro, P. Sánchez Valero, S. Cañadas Palazón.
Manual de movilización e inmovilización en la atención inicial al trauma pediátrico.
Ergon, (2017),
[22]
A.M. Dietrich, S. Shaner.
Pediatric trauma life support: for prehospital care providers, 3rd ed.,
[23]
A. Merelman, M. Perlmutter, R. Strayer.
Alternatives to rapid sequence intubation: contemporary airway management with ketamine.
West J Emerg Med, 20 (2019), pp. 466-471
[24]
E. Schmucker Agudelo, M. Farré Pinilla, E. Andreu Riobello, T. Franco Castanys, I. Villaverde Castillo, E. Monclus Diaz, et al.
An update in paediatric airway management.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim Engl Ed, 69 (2022), pp. 472-486
[25]
C.J. Coté, C.J. Hartnick.
Pediatric transtracheal and cricothyrotomy airway devices for emergency use: which are appropriate for infants and children?.
Paediatr Anaesth, 19 (2009), pp. 66-76
[26]
R. Bird, D. Braunold, C.T. Matava.
Chest trauma in children—what an anesthesiologist should know. Von Ungern‐Sternberg B, editor.
Pediatr Anesth, 32 (2022), pp. 340-345
[27]
P. Van De Voorde, N.M. Turner, J. Djakow, N. De Lucas, A. Martinez-Mejias, D. Biarent, et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: paediatric life support.
Resuscitation, 161 (2021), pp. 327-387
[28]
J. Vassallo, T. Nutbeam, A.C. Rickard, M.D. Lyttle, B. Scholefield, I.K. Maconochie, et al.
Paediatric traumatic cardiac arrest: the development of an algorithm to guide recognition, management and decisions to terminate resuscitation.
Emerg Med J, 35 (2018), pp. 669-674
[29]
L. Stolz, E. Situ-LaCasse, J. Acuña, M. Thompson, N. Hawbaker, J. Valenzuela, et al.
What is the ideal approach for emergent pericardiocentesis using point-of-care ultrasound guidance?.
World J Emerg Med, 12 (2021), pp. 169
[30]
M. Su, D. McArthur, J. Lerner, D. Arndt, J. Matsumoto, H. Valino, et al.
Timing matters: early post traumatic seizures in a pediatric population.
Neurology, 80 (2013), pp. P01.024
[31]
G.W. Hornig.
Flushing in relation to a possible rise in intracranial pressure: documentation of an unusual clinical sign: report of five cases.
J Neurosurg, 92 (2000), pp. 1040-1044
[32]
N.R. Mishra, A. Agrawal, R.R. Das.
Hypertonic saline vs. mannitol in management of elevated intracranial pressure in children: a meta-analysis.
Indian J Pediatr, 90 (2023), pp. 899-906
[33]
R. Rossaint, A. Afshari, B. Bouillon, V. Cerny, D. Cimpoesu, N. Curry, et al.
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.
[34]
J.F. Holmes, A. Gladman, C.H. Chang.
Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis.
J Pediatr Surg, 42 (2007), pp. 1588-1594
[35]
A.C. Greene, S.P. Sandifer, M. Shpigel, S.D. Safford.
Pediatric trauma—not just little adults-part 2: differences in radiographic workup and management.
Curr Surg Rep, 12 (2024), pp. 196-204
[36]
J.C. Leonard, C.D. Josephson, J.F. Luther, S.R. Wisniewski, C. Allen, F. Chiusolo, et al.
Life-threatening bleeding in children: a prospective observational study.
Crit Care Med, 49 (2021), pp. 1943-1954
[37]
R.T. Russell, M.M. Bembea, M.A. Borgman, R.S. Burd, B.A. Gaines, M. Jafri, et al.
Pediatric traumatic hemorrhagic shock consensus conference research priorities.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 94 (2023), pp. S11-S18
[38]
Advanced trauma life support: student course manual, eleven edition, American College of Surgeons, (2025),
[39]
T.E. Philbeck, J.G. McDonald, M. Carew, C. Ross.
Retrospective observational study of safety, performance, and duration of use of battery-powered intraosseous access device in pediatric patients.
SAGE Open Med, 12 (2024),
[40]
S.F. Polites, R.M. Nygaard, P.N. Reddy, M.D. Zielinski, C.J. Richardson, T.A. Elsbernd, et al.
Multicenter study of crystalloid boluses and transfusion in pediatric trauma-When to go to blood?.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 85 (2018), pp. 108-112
[41]
P.C. Spinella, J.C. Leonard, C. Marshall, J.F. Luther, S.R. Wisniewski, C.D. Josephson, et al.
Transfusion ratios and deficits in injured children with life-threatening bleeding.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 23 (2022), pp. 235-244
[42]
S. Park, J. Rodriguez, Z. Zhang, S. Miyata.
Review of Low Titer Group O Whole Blood (LTOWB) transfusion in initial resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients: assessing potential benefits.
J Pediatr Surg, 60 (2025),
[43]
B. Gupta, N. Garg, R. Ramachandran.
Vasopressors: do they have any role in hemorrhagic shock?.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 33 (2017), pp. 3-8
[44]
J.T. Patregnani, A.A. Sochet, D. Klugman.
Short-term peripheral vasoactive infusions in pediatrics: where is the harm?.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 18 (2017), pp. e378-e381
[45]
R.T. Russell, J.R. Esparaz, M.A. Beckwith, P.J. Abraham, M.M. Bembea, M.A. Borgman, et al.
Pediatric traumatic hemorrhagic shock consensus conference recommendations.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 94 (2023), pp. S2-S10
[46]
E.C. Alberto, E. McKenna, M.J. Amberson, J. Tashiro, K. Donnelly, A.A. Thenappan, et al.
Metrics of shock in pediatric trauma patients: a systematic search and review.
Injury, 52 (2021), pp. 3166-3172
[47]
M.L. Reppucci, S.N. Acker, E. Cooper, M. Meier, J. Stevens, R. Phillips, et al.
Improved identification of severely injured pediatric trauma patients using reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 92 (2022), pp. 69-73
[48]
R. Phillips, S.N. Acker, N. Shahi, M. Meier, D. Leopold, J. Recicar, et al.
The ABC-D score improves the sensitivity in predicting need for massive transfusion in pediatric trauma patients.
J Pediatr Surg, 55 (2020), pp. 331-334
[49]
M.E. Evangelista, M. Gaffley, L.P. Neff.
Massive transfusion protocols for pediatric patients: current perspectives.
J Blood Med, 11 (2020), pp. 163-172
[50]
V. Arsenault, L. Lieberman, P. Akbari, K. Murto, the Canadian Obstetrical Pediatric Transfusion Network.
Canadian tertiary care pediatric massive hemorrhage protocols: a survey and comprehensive national review.
Can J Anesth Can Anesth, 71 (2024), pp. 453-464
[51]
M. Hamele, J.K. Aden, M.A. Borgman.
Tranexamic acid in pediatric combat trauma requiring massive transfusions and mortality.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 89 (2020), pp. S242-S245
[52]
A. Annam, S. Josephs, T. Johnson, A.M. Kulungowski, R.B. Towbin, A.M. Cahill.
Pediatric trauma and the role of the interventional radiologist.
Emerg Radiol, 29 (2022), pp. 903-914
[53]
R.L. Gates, M. Price, D.B. Cameron, S. Somme, R. Ricca, T.A. Oyetunji, et al.
Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in children: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee systematic review.
J Pediatr Surg, 54 (2019), pp. 1519-1526
[54]
A.N. Kanani, S. Hartshorn.
NICE clinical guideline NG39: major trauma: assessment and initial management.
Arch Dis Child - Educ Pract Ed, 102 (2017), pp. 20-23
[55]
R.F. Williams, H. Grewal, R. Jamshidi, B. Naik-Mathuria, M. Price, R.T. Russell, et al.
Updated APSA Guidelines for the management of blunt liver and spleen injuries.
J Pediatr Surg, 58 (2023), pp. 1411-1418
[56]
M.C. Dewan, N. Mummareddy, J.C. Wellons, C.M. Bonfield.
Epidemiology of global pediatric traumatic brain injury: qualitative review.
World Neurosurg, 91 (2016), pp. 497-509.e1
[57]
S.S. Lang, R. Rahman, N. Kumar, A. Tucker, T.M. Flanders, M. Kirschen, et al.
Invasive neuromonitoring modalities in the pediatric population.
Neurocrit Care, 38 (2023), pp. 470-485
[58]
M. Stippler, V. Ortiz, P.D. Adelson, Y.F. Chang, E.C. Tyler-Kabara, S.R. Wisniewski, et al.
Brain tissue oxygen monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury in children: relationship to outcome and association with other clinical parameters.
J Neurosurg Pediatr, 10 (2012), pp. 383-391
[59]
J. Jiang, H. Sari, R. Goldman, E. Huff, A. Hanna, R. Samraj, et al.
Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) measurement using pupillometry and outcomes in critically ill children.
Cureus, 15 (2023),
[60]
F. Lioi, J. Ramm-Pettersen, A. Fratini, C. Riva, N. Colella, P. Missori.
Ultrasonographic assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter as a screening tool for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury.
World Neurosurg, 192 (2024), pp. e42-e48
[61]
T.S. Ko, E. Catennacio, S.S. Shin, J. Stern, S.L. Massey, T.J. Kilbaugh, et al.
Advanced neuromonitoring modalities on the horizon: detection and management of acute brain injury in children.
Neurocrit Care, 38 (2023), pp. 791-811
[62]
M.E. Lovett, T. Maa, M. Moore-Clingenpeel, N.F. O’Brien.
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound findings in children with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury following abusive head trauma.
Childs Nerv Syst, 36 (2020), pp. 993-1000
[63]
J. Vaewpanich, K. Reuter-Rice.
Continuous electroencephalography in pediatric traumatic brain injury: seizure characteristics and outcomes.
Epilepsy Behav, 62 (2016), pp. 225-230
[64]
N.S. Thango, U.K. Rohlwink, L. Dlamini, M.P. Tshavhungwe, E. Banderker, S. Salie, et al.
Brain interstitial glycerol correlates with evolving brain injury in paediatric traumatic brain injury.
Childs Nerv Syst, 37 (2021), pp. 1713-1721
[65]
S. Agrawal, F. Abecasis, I. Jalloh.
Neuromonitoring in children with traumatic brain injury.
Neurocrit Care, 40 (2024), pp. 147-158
[66]
P. Emami, P. Czorlich, F.S. Fritzsche, M. Westphal, J.M. Rueger, R. Lefering, et al.
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.
J Neurosurg, 126 (2017), pp. 760-767
[67]
V. Volovici, D. Pisică, B.Y. Gravesteijn, C.M.F. Dirven, E.W. Steyerberg, A. Ercole, et al.
Comparative effectiveness of intracranial hypertension management guided by ventricular versus intraparenchymal pressure monitoring: a CENTER-TBI study.
Acta Neurochir (Wien), 164 (2022), pp. 1693-1705
[68]
C. Robba, S. Pozzebon, B. Moro, J.L. Vincent, J. Creteur, F.S. Taccone.
Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study.
[69]
K.S. Woods, C.M. Horvat, S. Kantawala, D.W. Simon, J. Rakkar, P.M. Kochanek, et al.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 22 (2021), pp. 135-146
[70]
Y. Udomphorn, W.M. Armstead, M.S. Vavilala.
Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation after pediatric traumatic brain injury.
Pediatr Neurol, 38 (2008), pp. 225-234
[71]
E. Sorrentino, J. Diedler, M. Kasprowicz, K.P. Budohoski, C. Haubrich, P. Smielewski, et al.
Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.
Neurocrit Care, 16 (2012), pp. 258-266
[72]
P.J. Hutchinson, I. Jalloh, A. Helmy, K.L.H. Carpenter, E. Rostami, B.M. Bellander, et al.
Consensus statement from the 2014 International Microdialysis Forum.
Intensive Care Med, 41 (2015), pp. 1517-1528
[73]
P.M. Kochanek, R.C. Tasker, N. Carney, A.M. Totten, P.D. Adelson, N.R. Selden, et al.
Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition: update of the brain trauma foundation guidelines.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 20 (2019), pp. S1-82
[74]
E. St-Louis, D. Bracco, J. Hanley, T. Razek, R. Baird.
Development and validation of a new pediatric resuscitation and trauma outcome (PRESTO) model using the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank.
J Pediatr Surg, 53 (2018), pp. 136-140
[75]
C. Melhado, K. Remick, A. Miskovic, B. Patel, H.A. Hewes, C.D. Newgard, et al.
The association between pediatric readiness and mortality for injured children treated at US trauma centers.
Ann Surg, 280 (2024), pp. e26-e33
[76]
J. Gómez Veiras, J. Lluna González, A. Prieto Campo, M. Gómez Tellado, L. Alonso Jiménez, M. López Díaz, et al.
Spanish primary care in pediatric trauma (AITP) consensus: an AITP checklist.
Cir Pediátrica, 37 (2024), pp. 50-54
[77]
T. Gauss, M. De Jongh, M. Maegele, E. Cole, P. Bouzat.
Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050.
Crit Care, 28 (2024),
[78]
A.E. Kornblith, N. Addo, M. Plasencia, A. Shaahinfar, M. Lin-Martore, N. Sabbineni, et al.
Development of a consensus-based definition of focused assessment with sonography for trauma in children.
JAMA Netw Open, 5 (2022),
[79]
M. Chico Fernández, C. García Fuentes, F. Guerrero López.
Registros de trauma: una prioridad sanitaria, un proyecto estratégico para la SEMICYUC.
Med Intensiva, 37 (2013), pp. 284-289
[80]
M.J. Bell, P.D. Adelson, S.R. Wisniewski, Investigators of the ADAPT Study.
Challenges and opportunities for pediatric severe TBI-review of the evidence and exploring a way forward.
Childs Nerv Syst, 33 (2017), pp. 1663-1667
Copyright © 2025. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario