Chapter 5 - Brain death

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64142-7.00042-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Declaration of brain death requires demonstration of irreversible injury to the whole brain including the brainstem. Current guidelines rely on bedside clinical examination to determine that the patient has irreversible coma, absent cranial nerve reflexes, and apnea. Neurophysiologic testing to support the clinical diagnosis of brain death has primarily consisted of EEG and evoked potentials—typically a combination of somatosensory evoked potential and brainstem auditory evoked potential. The diagnostic accuracy of these ancillary tests has been studied for the last few decades but the role of ancillary neurophysiologic testing in brain death continues to be a source of controversy. This chapter reviews the relevant studies and guidelines about EEG and evoked potentials in ancillary testing for brain death. Clinical scenarios in which neurophysiologic testing may aid the declaration of brain death include equivocal results of clinical examination findings, inability to perform some aspects of the neurologic examination, concern for residual sedative effects, suspected spinal cord or neuromuscular injury, and posterior fossa lesions with brainstem involvement. In these scenarios, EEG and evoked potentials may offer supportive evidence for irreversible injury to the whole brain. This chapter also discusses differences between current adult and pediatric guidelines for the role of ancillary testing in brain death.

Introduction

The concept of brain death has evolved in parallel with advances in intensive care medicine and ventilator support since the 1950s. Criteria had to be established for the determination of death in patients with irreversible cessation of brain function. Developing standardized procedures for the declaration of brain death was also crucial to advances in solid organ transplant. Formal efforts at defining brain death began in earnest with the Harvard Criteria in 1968, followed by the US Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) in 1981. The UDDA stated that “an individual who has sustained either 1) irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions, or 2) irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brainstem, is dead. A determination of death must be made with accepted medical standards” (UDDA, 1980). In 1995, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) published a practice parameter codifying the process for declaration of brain death (Quality Standards Subcommittee of the AAN, 1995), which was subsequently updated in 2010 (Wijdicks et al., 2010). In most countries, including the United States, brain death is defined as irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain including the brainstem—referred to as whole brain death. The clinical definition of whole brain death includes irreversible coma, absence of all brainstem reflexes, and apnea in the setting of a known brain injury that is sufficient to cause brain death. Some countries—England and Canada among them—have defined brain death as “brainstem death.” In addition to national laws and professional guidelines, the process for determination of brain death—how many examinations are required, the qualifications of examiners, mandatory observation period, and use of ancillary testing—is also dictated by state and local laws as well as institutional policies. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has published separate guidelines for brain death in children. Inconsistent policies have contributed to significant variability in clinical practice, particularly with regard to the application of ancillary tests.

The most recent AAN practice parameter provides practical guidance on the clinical examination necessary for brain death declaration including exclusion of drug intoxication, severe metabolic derangements, shock, hypothermia, and other brain death mimics (Wijdicks et al., 2010). The neurologic examination requires demonstration of coma, absence of all cranial nerve reflexes, and apnea. The current AAN practice parameter does not recommend any ancillary testing beyond a single bedside neurologic examination and apnea test unless a complete examination cannot be reliably performed or the results are equivocal (Wijdicks et al., 2010). Common reasons for inability to perform a complete neurologic examination include residual sedative drug effects, metabolic derangements, cervical spinal cord or peripheral nervous system injuries that preclude reliable examination, and facial injuries with inability to examine all cranial nerves. Common reasons for inability to perform apnea testing include hypoxia, hemodynamic instability, cardiopulmonary bypass, or patients with baseline hypercarbia due to chronic lung diseases.

Ancillary testing for brain death is broadly divided into two categories: tests of cerebral perfusion and neurophysiologic tests. Perfusion tests that have been described in the medical literature include conventional cerebral angiography, CT angiography (CTA) and perfusion, MR angiography (MRA) and perfusion, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD), and nuclear medicine brain perfusion scans (most commonly SPECT). Complete absence of blood flow to the brain including the brainstem is considered evidence of brain death. In the case of TCD, absent cerebral perfusion is demonstrated by recording systolic spikes oroscillating flow within the bilateral intracranial internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries (Monteiro et al., 2006). Although catheter angiography is often described as the gold standard for demonstrating absence of cerebral perfusion, this test is rarely performed in routine clinical practice. CTA and TCD are commonly included as ancillary tests in Europe, but the 2010 AAN practice parameter found insufficient evidence to recommend these tests (Wijdicks et al., 2010). The nuclear medicine brain perfusion scan remains a preferred ancillary test in the AAN guidelines and is commonly employed in the United States (Wijdicks et al., 2010). The remainder of this chapter focuses on ancillary testing for brain death with EEG and multimodality evoked potentials.

Section snippets

Variability in Use of Ancillary Tests for Brain Death Determination

Despite the development of guidelines by the AAN, significant variability in the use of ancillary testing to confirm brain death in adults continues to be reported in the United States—in part due to variability in state laws. In a survey of 492 US hospitals, ancillary testing was mandatory in 6.5% of hospital brain death policies (Greer et al., 2016). In addition, 64.2% of hospital policies specified situations in which ancillary testing should be considered, including inability to complete

Technical Standards for Ancillary Testing with EEG

The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has published minimal technical standards for EEG recording in suspected brain death since 1970. The latest iteration of the standards was published in 2016 and accounts for advances in digital EEG recording techniques. This document recommends standard terminology including use of the term electrocerebral inactivity (ECI) (Fig. 5.1) to describe the absence of any nonartifactual EEG activity over 2 μV when recording from scalp electrode pairs 10 or

EEG Ancillary Testing in Brain Death

Despite widespread use, there are very few recent studies of the diagnostic accuracy of EEG for brain death testing. In one study of 15 adult patients who met clinical criteria for brain death, only 8 patients had ECI (53% sensitivity) while 7 patients had residual low-voltage EEG activity (Paolin et al., 1995). In another study of 56 patients meeting clinical criteria for brain death, the sensitivity for detection of ECI was reported to be 80.6%. In this study, low-voltage EEG activity

Common EEG Artifacts in Brain Death Testing

There are a number of challenges to EEG recording in the busy electric environment of the ICU, especially using the high-sensitivity settings recommended for ancillary testing of brain death. Electrodes are subject to environmental artifacts that impede interpretation by introducing electric noise. IV drip artifact is common in the ICU and produces regular, metronomic artifact appearing in one or more leads that may be misinterpreted as cortical activity. EKG artifact is almost universally

Evoked Potentials for Ancillary Testing in Brain Death

Because brainstem and cortical pathways are evaluated by somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), these tests are employed as ancillary tests for brain death—either in combination with EEG or as standalone tests. Utilization of evoked potentials for brain death testing in the United States is low but they are more commonly used in Europe and elsewhere. In the United States, evoked potentials are much more commonly employed for prognostication in

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Median nerve SSEP tests conduction along the somatosensory pathway with standard electrode placement and naming conventions (ACNS, 2006). Brain death is associated with loss of all the intracranial SSEP components and preservation of the extracranial components. For median nerve SSEP, the P14, N18, N20, and middle-latency potentials are absent, while the EP potential and cervical N13 are preserved (Guérit et al., 2009). Because the P14 and N20 potentials are preserved even with sufficient

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials

BAEPs measure conduction of acoustic stimuli presented as a series of clicks delivered via headphones. These auditory stimuli produce measurable potentials conducted by the acoustic nerve through the brainstem and cortex. Signal conduction is then measured from mastoid and scalp electrodes as a series of far-field and near-field potentials. By convention, the resulting potentials are named sequentially from peripheral to central rather than by conduction latency. Wave I represents peripheral

Pediatric Brain Death Testing

In 1987, the AAP released guidelines for brain death determination in infants and children, which were revised in 2011 (Nakagawa et al., 2011). Unlike adult guidelines, two clinical examinations are required to be performed by two attending physicians separated by a mandatory observation period of 12 h in children older than 30 days to 18 years of age and 24 h in newborns up to age 30 days (Mathur and Ashwal, 2015). The AAP guidelines provide for a reduction in the duration of the observation

Controversies in Ancillary Testing for Brain Death

The medical literature is rife with strongly worded expert opinions about the role and appropriateness of ancillary testing for brain death—especially neurophysiologic tests (Young et al., 2006; Wijdicks, 2010). Proponents argue that diagnosis of whole brain death requires certainty that irrevocable cessation of all cerebral and brainstem function has occurred prior to declaration of death (Gert van Dijk, 2013). From this perspective, multimodality neurophysiologic testing with EEG to

Conclusions

Declaration of brain death requires demonstration of irreversible injury to the whole brain, including the brainstem. Current guidelines rely on bedside clinical examination to determine that the patient has irreversible coma due to an etiology capable of causing brain death, absent cranial nerve reflexes, and apnea. Considerable variability exists among provider practices, institutional policies, state laws, professional guidelines, and national laws. Neurophysiologic testing to support the

References (38)

  • K.M. Busl et al.

    Pitfalls in the diagnosis of brain death

    Neurocrit Care

    (2009)
  • G. Citerio et al.

    Variability in brain death determination in Europe: looking for a solution

    Neurocrit Care

    (2014)
  • J. Gert van Dijk

    Testing brain death: a trying condition

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2013)
  • D.M. Greer et al.

    End-of-life and brain death in acute coma and disorders of consciousness

    Semin Neurol

    (2013)
  • D.M. Greer et al.

    Variability of brain death policies in the United States

    JAMA Neurol

    (2016)
  • M.M. Grigg et al.

    Electroencephalographic activity after brain death

    Arch Neurol

    (1987)
  • J.M. Guérit

    Electroencephalography: the worst traditionally recommended tool for brain death confirmation

    Intensive Care Med

    (2007)
  • C. Machado

    Diagnosis of brain death

    Neurol Int

    (2010)
  • Cited by (6)

    View full text