Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 360, Issue 9350, 21–28 December 2002, Pages 2026-2030
The Lancet

Articles
Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)12022-8Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Considerations of dignity are often raised in reference to the care of dying patients. However, little research that addresses this issue has been done. Our aim was to identify the extent to which dying patients perceive they are able to maintain a sense of dignity, and to ascertain how demographic and disease-specific variables relate to the issue of dignity in these individuals.

Methods

We did a cross-sectional study of a cohort of terminally ill patients with cancer, who had a life expectancy of less than 6 months. We enrolled 213 patients from two palliative care units in Winnipeg, Canada, and asked them to rate their sense of dignity. Our main outcome measures included: a 7-point sense of dignity item; the symptom distress scale; the McGill pain questionnaire; the index of independence in activities of daily living (IADL); a quality of life scale; a brief battery of self-report measures, including screening for desire for death, anxiety, hopelessness, and will to live; burden to others; and requirement for social support.

Findings

16 of 213 patients (7·5%; 95% CI 4–11) indicated that loss of dignity was a great concern. These patients were far more than likely than the rest of the cohort to report psychological distress and symptom distress, heightened dependency needs, and loss of will to live.

Interpretation

Loss of dignity is closely associated with certain types of distress often seen among the terminally ill. Preservation of dignity should be an overall aim of treatment and care in patients who are nearing death.

Introduction

Considerations of dignity are often raised in reference to the care of dying patients.1, 2 For many palliative patients with cancer, their families, and caregivers, dignity conveys an inherent respect to be granted to patients in preparation for death. Support for assisted suicide or euthanasia is often based on a concern for patients' dignity, with those on either side of this debate invoking considerations of dignity at the heart of their respective positions.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Nevertheless, little research that addresses the issue of dignity, and involves dying patients as primary informants, has been done.10, 11 Our aim was to assess the extent to which patients near the end of life perceive that they are able to maintain a sense of dignity, and to identify how various demographic and disease-specific variables are related to the issue of dignity in the terminally ill.

Section snippets

Participants

Between June, 1996, and May, 2000, we recruited individuals with cancer from two palliative care units in Winnipeg, Canada. The units are located at St Boniface General Hospital and the Riverview Health Centre; both are urban, extended-care hospitals with specialty palliative care units. The units provide inpatient, and coordinate community-based, end-of-life care services. The medical status of every patient at these units was reviewed by the treatment staff, who independently ascertained

Results

Of the 369 patients identified as candidates, five died before the interview could take place, 13 were transferred to a different care setting, and one denied having cancer. Furthermore, 55 patients had sufficient symptom distress or further deterioration in their general condition, or both, that they were unable to participate. Of the remaining 295 patients, 213 (72%) agreed to participate in the study (43 outpatients, 170 inpatients), with a median length of survival from the time of study

Discussion

Although nearly half the patients in our sample reported at least some, or occasional, dignity concerns, most patients claimed a strong sense of personal dignity. This finding suggests that a person's sense of dignity is a particularly resilient construct and, in most instances, is able to withstand the various physical and psychological challenges that face patients who are terminally ill. Although the process of dying is often described in terms of inevitable indignities, reports from

References (29)

  • Council on Scientific Affairs

    Good care of the dying patient

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • F Pannuti et al.

    Dying with dignity: illusion, hope or human right?

    World Health Forum

    (1993)
  • AL Back et al.

    Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington state: patient requests and physician responses

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1996)
  • L Ganzini et al.

    Physicians' experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • Cited by (323)

    • The sense of dignity care and the perceived social support for hospitalized elderly patients

      2023, International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The PDI is a 25-item scale. After doing psychometrics in x, it contains four dimensions include loss of human value (11 questions), emotional distress and uncertainty (8 questions), changes in ability and mental image (4 questions), and loss of independence(2 questions)(Abbaszadeh et al., 2015). When patients are asked to complete the 25-item PDI.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text