Short communicationReduced imipenem susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates with plasmid-mediated CMY-2 and DHA-1 β-lactamases co-mediated by porin loss
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumoniae is frequently isolated from serious nosocomial infections and is increasingly resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins via production of various extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) [1] and plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes, with the latter also conferring resistance to cephamycin [2]. A plasmidic AmpC enzyme, CMY-1, was detected in Korea in 1988, with CMY-2 and other AmpC types subsequently becoming widespread in Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae[3].
Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing ESBLs and plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes mostly remain susceptible to carbapenems and, whilst carbapenem resistance is increasingly prevalent among Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. in Korea, it remains very rare among Enterobacteriaceae, as is other countries. Nevertheless, carbapenem resistance can arise in Enterobacteriaceae, mediated by class A, D or B carbapenemases [4] or via combination of AmpC or ESBLs together with impermeability [5].
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of resistance and clonality among 42 imipenem-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolates collected between 2002 and 2004 at one tertiary care hospital in Korea.
Section snippets
Isolates and susceptibility testing
Forty-two non-duplicate isolates of K. pneumoniae isolated between 2002 and 2004 from patients at one tertiary care hospital in Korea were investigated. Isolates were identified by conventional phenotypic tests [6] and the imipenem susceptibility was determined by a disk diffusion method [7] using commercial disks and Mueller–Hinton agar (Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD). ESBLs were determined by double-disk tests with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30
Antimicrobial susceptibility and detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC genes
Among the 42 imipenem-non-susceptible isolates of K. pneumoniae, 2 were positive by the imipenem disk Hodge test and the EDTA-SMA double-disk synergy test, indicating the presence of MBL. blaVIM-2 alleles were detected in these isolates by PCR. All the remaining 40 isolates were negative for these tests and lacked genes for known MBLs. However, they were resistant to cefoxitin and 33 gave positive results in the cefoxitin disk Hodge test, suggesting production of AmpC β-lactamases, although it
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ms. Myungsook Kim for collecting the isolates and to Ms. Younghee Seo and Ms. Chasoon Lee for technical assistance.
References (15)
- et al.
Evaluation of phenotypic screening methods for detecting plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases-producing isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
(2005) - et al.
Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors
Clin Microbiol Rev
(1998) - et al.
Plasmid-determined AmpC-type β-lactamases
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(2002) - et al.
Prevalence of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Korea
Microb Drug Resist
(2006) - et al.
Metallo-β-lactamases: the quiet before the storm?
Clin Microbiol Rev
(2005) - et al.
Roles of β-lactamases and porins in activities of carbapenems and cephalosporins against Klebsiella pneumoniae
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(1999) Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification
Cited by (54)
An Unusual Carbapenem Resistant Escherichia coli Carrying Plasmid-mediated AmpC and Mutated ompC in A Patient with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
2020, IDCasesCitation Excerpt :This highly mutated ompC is predicted to result in porin loss, which in conjunction with the plasmid-mediated blaCMY-2, explains the carbapenem resistance in our case. Notably this resistance mechanism (i.e., pAmpC + porin loss) has already been identified in both K. pneumoniae and E. coli previously [3,21]. However, the current prevalence of carbapenem resistant E. coli with this mechanism in the U.S. is still unknown.
Successful containment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by strict contact precautions without active surveillance
2014, American Journal of Infection ControlCitation Excerpt :Noncarbapenemase-producing CRE are generally regarded as less significant in terms of public health than carbapenemase producers, and the importance of infection control measures is also less emphasized. In principle, however, the horizontal spread of plasmid-mediated β-lactamases remains a possibility, and a clonal outbreak of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases producing KPN has indeed been reported.21 Our isolates were not clonally related, and we implemented several infection control strategies at once; therefore, we cannot estimate the impact of each separately.
Detection of Amp C genes encoding for beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
2012, Indian Journal of Medical MicrobiologyCarbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Here is the storm!
2012, Trends in Molecular MedicineCitation Excerpt :Plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase genes are often associated with coresistance to other antibiotics (e.g. aminoglycosides, tetracycline, sulfonamides) as a consequence of the colocalization of antibiotic resistance genes on the same plasmids [10]. The selection of isolates with carbapenem resistance or decreased carbapenem susceptibility has been sometimes observed during a carbapenem-based treatment [10,17,19]. Similarly, production of an ESBL in combination with outer membrane permeability defects can be responsible for carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae [8,19,20].