Clinical paperComparing the prognosis of those with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythms with increasing durations of CPR: Informing minimum durations of resuscitation☆,☆☆
Introduction
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is common; emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States attend 134 cases per 100,000 adult citizens annually,1 yielding survival rates between 3 and 16%.2 Despite this, although termination of resuscitation (TOR) rules may assist with certain patient subgroups, data outlining the appropriate duration of resuscitation prior to termination of efforts are lacking for both pre-hospital and emergency department clinicians.3, 4 Previous data has demonstrated that an initial shockable rhythm is a predictor of survival,2, 5 however, it is unclear if initial rhythm continues to impact the probability of a good outcome after prolonged durations of resuscitation, and whether initial rhythm should influence the duration of resuscitation.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the relationship between clinical outcomes and the elapsed duration since commencement of professional resuscitation, comparing differences between those with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythms. We hoped to inform decisions regarding the optimal duration of resuscitation efforts and to explore whether this should be influenced by initial cardiac rhythm. In addition, we sought to describe the characteristics of patients with favorable outcomes who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after prolonged resuscitations, and the elapsed duration beyond which the point estimate for the probability of survival declined to below 1%.
Section snippets
Methods
The institutional review boards and affiliated ethics committees of Providence Health Care, the University of British Columbia, and Vancouver Coastal Health approved this study.
Characteristics of study subjects
Between September 2007 and December 2011, there were 2419 cases of OHCA in our region. Patients not treated by EMS (n = 775), those aged <18 years (n = 17), and those in whom outcomes were unavailable due to missing identifiers (n = 10) were excluded, leaving a study cohort of 1617 patients. Agreement for CPC score and dichotomous neurological outcome at hospital discharge was excellent with kappa values of 0.95 (95% CI 0.89–1.00) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.96–1.00), respectively.
Full cohort
Table 1 describes patient
Discussion
We examined 1617 consecutive EMS-treated OHCA patients in a single region, combining detailed pre-hospital data with reliable outcomes at hospital discharge. Overall, outcomes were positive in comparison to other regions.2 Similar to other studies, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 we found that shorter time-to-ROSC was independently associated with survival and neurological outcomes. Although the proportion of patients with favorable neurological outcomes achieving ROSC prior to incremental time junctures
Conclusions
Although both subgroups of shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms demonstrated an independent association of time-to-ROSC and outcomes, this association was less pronounced in patients with initial shockable rhythms indicating a higher resilience for positive outcomes after prolonged durations of CPR. Resuscitation of patients with initial shockable rhythms continued to yield neurologically intact survivors until 47.5 min; among those with non-shockable initial rhythms the longest
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References (23)
- et al.
Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support
Ann Emerg Med
(1999) - et al.
Rationale, development and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resusci
Resuscitation
(2004) - et al.
Termination of resuscitation in the prehospital setting for adult patients suffering nontraumatic cardiac arrest. National Association of EMS Physicians Standards and Clinical Practice Committee
Prehosp Emerg Care
(2000) - et al.
Factors influencing survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
Recovery after discontinued cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Lancet
(1982) - et al.
Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study
Lancet
(2012) - et al.
Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Resuscitation
(2014) - et al.
Comparison of termination-of-resuscitation guidelines for basic life support: defibrillator providers in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Ann Emerg Med
(2006) - et al.
Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association
Circulation
(2014)
Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome
JAMA
Cited by (90)
Prognosis of Cardiac Arrest—Peri-arrest and Post-arrest Considerations
2023, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.021.
- ☆☆
A portion of this data was presented on November 15, 2014 at the American Heart Association Resuscitation Science Symposium in Chicago, IL.