Natural History and Determinants of Conduction Defects Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62027-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were followed prospectively to ascertain the natural history and determinants of new postoperative conduction defects. Each patient was followed in the postoperative period with serial electrocardiograms and continuous monitoring. In the last 70 patients, a technetium pyrophosphate scan was obtained 48 to 72 hours after operation. Postoperatively, new bundle-branch or fascicular block developed in 42 patients (45%) and third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, in 4 (4%). The occurrence was compared with patient age, preoperative bundle-branch block or fascicular block, number of diseased arteries, number of bypassed arteries, total time of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping time, occurrence of a preoperative or perioperative myocardial infarction, and presence of disease in the left anterior descending or right coronary artery. Only the number of bypassed arteries, the total time of cardiopulmonary bypass, and the aortic cross-clamping time were related to the development of postoperative conduction defects (all, p < .05). The conduction defect resolved partially or completely by the time of hospital discharge in 54% of patients. In the 4 patients with third-degree AV block, AV block resolved on postoperative day 2 in 1 patient and resolved transiently for up to 5 days or persisted in 3 patients. At two months of follow-up, all 3 patients discharged in third-degree AV block with a permanent pacemaker were no longer in AV block.

In conclusion, following CABG, (1) the occurrence of new AV conduction defects is related to the number of vessels bypassed, the cardiopulmonary bypass pump time, and the aortic cross-clamping time; (2) new conduction defects occur frequently, but the resolution rate is high and third-degree AV block is rare if it is not present by postoperative day 1; (3) because resolution of third-degree AV block may be only transient, patients who have recovered from AV block should be observed for several days before discharge; and (4) ventricular demand pacing may be adequate in patients who require a pacemaker at the time of discharge, because the AV block may resolve by two months of follow-up.

Cited by (78)

  • Incidence and predictors of late atrioventricular conduction recovery among patients requiring permanent pacemaker for complete heart block after cardiac surgery

    2017, Heart Rhythm
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, the lack of recovery in the 2000–2004 subgroup likely represents a follow-up bias toward long-term dependent patients as opposed to improvements in surgical techniques (given the unchanged recovery rates from 2005–2014). This analysis uniquely reports the previously uncharacterized chronology of late AV conduction recovery21 by using serial device interrogation data 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. As depicted in Figure 2, most recovery occurred in the first month postoperatively, with median ventricular pacing for the subgroup decreasing from 96% to 7%, although with significant variation (IQR 38).

  • The effect of surgical access for mitral valve surgery on incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular block

    2017, Cor et Vasa
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, no statistical difference was recorded in AVB incidence. If longer CPB and clamping time lead to higher AVB incidence, as presented by some authors, this result could by caused by a protective effect of AVB incidence by the choice left atrium access [30]. However, it could also be caused by the lack of effect of postoperative AVB incidence by CPB and clamping time, which correlates with results of other authors [7].

  • Atrioventricular Conduction System Disease

    2016, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
View all citing articles on Scopus

We acknowledge the statistical assistance of Steven Schmaltz, M.P.H., and the excellent secretarial assistance of Mrs. Lisa Hackbarth.

View full text