Natural History and Determinants of Conduction Defects Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
References (10)
- et al.
Etiology and clinical significance of new fascicular conduction defects following coronary bypass surgery
Am Heart J
(1986) - et al.
Fascicular conduction disturbances after coronary bypass surgery
Am J Cardiol
(1978) - et al.
Transient bundle branch block following use of hypothermic cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass surgery: high incidence without perioperative myocardial infarction
Am Heart J
(1982) - et al.
Relationship between atrioventricular arrhythmias and the concentration of K+ ion in cardioplegic solution
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(1980) - et al.
Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of combined inferior myocardial infarction and left anterior hemiblock
Am J Cardiol
(1983)
Cited by (78)
Perioperative management in cardiovascular surgery
2021, Medicina IntensivaThe Hemodynamic Effects of Different Pacing Modalities After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function
2018, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaIncidence and predictors of late atrioventricular conduction recovery among patients requiring permanent pacemaker for complete heart block after cardiac surgery
2017, Heart RhythmCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the lack of recovery in the 2000–2004 subgroup likely represents a follow-up bias toward long-term dependent patients as opposed to improvements in surgical techniques (given the unchanged recovery rates from 2005–2014). This analysis uniquely reports the previously uncharacterized chronology of late AV conduction recovery21 by using serial device interrogation data 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. As depicted in Figure 2, most recovery occurred in the first month postoperatively, with median ventricular pacing for the subgroup decreasing from 96% to 7%, although with significant variation (IQR 38).
The effect of surgical access for mitral valve surgery on incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular block
2017, Cor et VasaCitation Excerpt :However, no statistical difference was recorded in AVB incidence. If longer CPB and clamping time lead to higher AVB incidence, as presented by some authors, this result could by caused by a protective effect of AVB incidence by the choice left atrium access [30]. However, it could also be caused by the lack of effect of postoperative AVB incidence by CPB and clamping time, which correlates with results of other authors [7].
Atrioventricular Conduction System Disease
2016, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
We acknowledge the statistical assistance of Steven Schmaltz, M.P.H., and the excellent secretarial assistance of Mrs. Lisa Hackbarth.