Publique en esta revista
Información de la revista
Vol. 40. Núm. 8.
Páginas 511-513 (Noviembre 2016)
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 40. Núm. 8.
Páginas 511-513 (Noviembre 2016)
Point of view
Acceso a texto completo
Care ethics. A new bioethical approach to humanize the ICU
Ética del cuidado. Un nuevo enfoque bioético para humanizar la UCI
A. Fernández-Truilloa,
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author at: C/Antoni Pujadas, 42 08830 Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
, H. Vallverdú-Cartiéb, B. Román-Maestrec
a Intensive Care Unit, PSSJD Hospital General, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
b Head of Departament of Surgery, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Barcelona, Spain
c Faculty of Philosophy, Barcelona University, Spain
Contenido relaccionado
A. Fernández-Trujillo, H. Vallverdú-Cartié, B. Román-Maestre
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Tablas (1)
Table 1. The ethics of care retrieves the affective and emotional supplementing a bioethics more rational as based on principles.
Texto completo

To stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) is an experience that has a tremendous impact on the quality of life of the patients.1 In several interviews, an important politician in Spain has expressed the pain and fear suffered during her ICU stay, which she described as the ‘vestibule of hell’. This perception has not left indifferent the professionals that we devote ourselves to the intensive care.

Patients in critical condition who are admitted to our units often find themselves immersed in a plethora of cables and sophisticated monitoring and life-support equipment. When the medical priority is to provide diagnostic support and treatment urgently needed, this tends to produce a kind of depersonalization of the patient. Nevertheless, the patients, at some point, become aware of their surroundings and later they are able to recall them.2

The consequences of life-support for those who survive an ICU stay invite reflection on certain aspects of this question which have, to date, been relegated to the background.3,4 The main concern in intensive care medicine, from an ethical perspective, has been to insure that the life support provided to each patient is consistent with that patient's needs so as to avoid therapeutic obstinacy, as well as to be able to detect and attend to end-of-life situations in an appropriate manner. This, in terms of principle-based bioethics, would correspond to non-malfeasance or beneficence.5 Also requiring reflection is the autonomy of the critically ill patients, given that they may not be in any condition to competently make decisions; in the absence of a living will, consent is required of a representative, either a family member or legal counsel.6

Patient testimonials or initiatives such as the HU-CI blog,7 highlight the fact that the principalist bioethics does not respond to all situations that can cause suffering to the people admitted to the ICU, so new ethical view is necessary; this time to try to modify the operation of the UCI and the attitude of the professionals, in order to reduce as much as possible the fear and pain, besides its consequences. Bioethical principles and code of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC) can help, but it is imperative a broader perspective.8

Care ethics could be defined as a type of relational ethics that ensures autonomy of vulnerable persons and uses a relational and context-bound approach toward morality and decision making.

Autonomy, in this case, is understood in a context, not self-sufficiency or independence, but interdependence. We live in a social framework which we need to be ourselves, to make our own decisions. The autonomy to which we refer is the moral ability to direct our own lives.9,10

The ethics of care retrieves the affective and emotional supplementing a bioethics more rational as based on principles (Table 1).11 This can influence to improve the experience of patients in the ICU, putting it in the foreground, in the center of attention. In a study that showed that admission to the ICU of patients with a limitation in life-support treatment was a common practice, Rubio noted that decision-making on the futility of a treatment is an act with ethical and moral implications.12 This alludes to the ethics of accountability—a necessary virtue for the professional who has to assume the responsibility for this decision-making. To respond is to take charge, to look after and care for a fragile individual. The ethics of care touch upon the emotional and affective domains which may have a part to play in improving the experience of patients in the ICU, placing this question at the heart of the matter. It is, of course, fundamental to include the physician in the task of caring, without restricting the work of nurses, as has been the case till now. Care should not be encumbered by professional or jurisdictional barriers.

Table 1.

The ethics of care retrieves the affective and emotional supplementing a bioethics more rational as based on principles.

Principalist ethics  Care ethics 
Deontologism/teleologism  Intuitionism/dialogical ethics 
Moral point of view: the other universal  Moral point of view: the other concrete 
Rationalism of principles  Emotions in moral decisions 
Universality  Diversity, the concrete 
Autonomy  Empowerment 
Distributive justice  Protection, positive discrimination 
Non maleficence  Vulnerability situation 
Beneficence  Good relationship (caretaker/patient) 
Standards of guidelines  Empathy in concrete without relativism 

One conclusion of a study entitled ‘Sufrimiento y su afrontamiento en la UCI’ (Facing Suffering in the ICU)13 is that the strategies for facing suffering, on both parts, patients and their families, were based on medical information (in addition to family support). The fact that nursing carries care as a virtue does not mean that the physician should not provide more than technical expertise, clinical practice guides, and protocols.

These strategies are necessary for the care, but they are not enough to reveal the person that may be found in the patient who is under care. Care requires a reciprocal relationship; if the carer does not identify what makes the patient different from all others, then to attend that patient's real needs will be nearly impossible. It is of the utmost importance to focus diagnostic and therapeutic strategies attentively toward the singularity of each patient; we are not there, after all, to treat illnesses, but rather people who are ill.

We all, as humans, require care at one time or another in our lives in order to develop as people, so that our voice, which makes each of us unique, may be heard. Caring and being cared for are indispensable parts of our survival, and those in the ICU finds themselves in a situation of great vulnerability in many ways. Levinas maintains that attending the Other (a term he uses to refer to a human being that is suffering) is a moral imperative, an inescapable call.14 When care is professionalized, it acquires a normative dimension. Healthcare personnel take on a moral commitment to others; care is the internal goods of the healthcare profession and a desirable virtue in those working in the ICU. In order to establish the relationship of care, the carer, as a professional, must take on among other virtues compassion and concern for the well-being of the patient. But even this is not enough, if it is not accompanied by action, by an attentive gaze, and by the application of technical know-how. Ethical care allows for an understanding of a person's needs beyond the purely biological in order to assume control over physical and psychological pain.

New ethical points of views are necessary to humanize intensive care, and physician involvement is essential in this process. Care ethics is a fundamental foundation for the building of the friendly ICU that we are starting to conceive of, an ICU in which patients and their families are treated well and recognize this. From this point, admission to the ICU can stop being a prelude to horrors.


The preparation of this manuscript has not sought nor received funding.

Conflict ofinterest

There has been no conflict of interest in the preparation of this manuscript.

P. Gómez-Carretero, V. Monsalve, J.F. Soriano, J. De Andrés.
Alteraciones emocionales y necesidades psicológicas en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos.
Med Int, 31 (2007), pp. 318-325
C. Chamorro, M.A. Romera.
Dolor y miedo en la UCI.
Med Int, 39 (2015), pp. 442-444
J.F. Jensen, T. Thomsen, D. Overgaard, M.H. Bestle, D. Christensen, I. Egerod.
Erratum to: impact of follow-up consultations for ICU survivors on post-ICU syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med, 41 (2015), pp. 763-775
A. Alonso-Ovies, G. Heras.
ICU. A branch of hell.
ICM, 42 (2016), pp. 591-592
T.L. Beauchamp, J.F. Childress.
Respect for autonomy, non maleficence, beneficence, justice.
Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th ed., pp. 120-394
Ley 41/2002, de 14 de Noviembre, Básica reguladora de la autonomía del paciente y los derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y documentación clínica. BOE 15th Noviembre 2002.
Heras G. Proyecto HU-CI. Humanizando los cuidados intensivos. [Accessed 10th March 2016] Available at
L.L. Cabré, R. Abizanda, F. Baigorri, L. Blanch, J.M. Campos, S. Iribarren, Grupo de Bioética de la SEMICYUC, et al.
Código ético de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva Y Unidades Coronarias.
Med Int, 30 (2006), pp. 68-73
F. Torralba.
Constructos éticos del cuidar.
Enferm Int, 11 (2000), pp. 136-141
I.M. Barrio.
Carol Gilligan y la ética del cuidado. Un referente para la ética de enfermería.
Enferm Clínica, 9 (1999), pp. 71-77
F.J. León-Correa.
Ética del cuidado feminista y bioética personalista.
Pers bioét [Internet], 12 (2008), pp. 51-61
[consulted 5th July 2016] Available at
O. Rubio, J.M. Sánchez, R. Fernández.
Criterios para limitar los tratamientos de soporte vital al ingreso en una unidad de cuidados intensivos: resultados de una encuesta multicéntrica nacional.
Med Int, 37 (2013), pp. 333-338
Montoro YM. Sufrimiento y su afrontamiento en una UCI. Observatorio de Bioética de la Universidad Católica de Bioética [internet] 2014 [consulted 10th March 2016] Available
Torralba F. Ética del cuidar. Fundamentos, contextos y problemas. 1° ed Madrid: MAPHRE S.A; 2006.
Copyright © 2016. Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC
Medicina Intensiva

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?