Share
array:23 [ "pii" => "S2173572722000960" "issn" => "21735727" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2021.08.015" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-02-01" "aid" => "1699" "copyright" => "The Author(s)" "copyrightAnyo" => "2021" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2023;47:73-83" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173572722002442" "issn" => "21735727" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2021.12.017" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-02-01" "aid" => "1739" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2023;47:84-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Association between septic patient mortality and blood survivin concentrations" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "84" "paginaFinal" => "89" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Asociación entre la mortalidad de pacientes sépticos y las concentraciones sanguíneas de survivina" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1280 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 191279 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Survival curves at 30 days using blood survivin concentrations higher vs lower or equal than 56.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>pg/mL.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "L. Lorente, M.M. Martín, R. Ortiz-López, A. Pérez-Cejas, C. Ferrer-Moure, A. Jiménez, A.F. González-Rivero" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Lorente" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.M." "apellidos" => "Martín" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Ortiz-López" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Pérez-Cejas" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Ferrer-Moure" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Jiménez" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A.F." "apellidos" => "González-Rivero" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210569122000080" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medin.2021.12.014" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210569122000080?idApp=WMIE" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572722002442?idApp=WMIE" "url" => "/21735727/0000004700000002/v2_202311091351/S2173572722002442/v2_202311091351/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173572722001710" "issn" => "21735727" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2021.10.013" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-02-01" "aid" => "1715" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2023;47:65-72" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Clinical outcomes according to timing to invasive ventilation due to noninvasive ventilation failure in children" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "65" "paginaFinal" => "72" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Resultados clínicos según el tiempo de inicio de la ventilación invasiva en niños con fracaso de la ventilación no invasiva" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 3538 "Ancho" => 1593 "Tamanyo" => 236341 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Kaplan–Meier analysis of the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) following the failure of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). A) The curves are compared according to the NIV times (≤6 h, 7–24 h and >24 h) prior to the use of IMV, yielding a log rank p-value of 0.479. B) In the subgroup with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), the log rank p-value was 0.830. C) In the subgroup without PARDS, the log rank p-value was 0.086.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "F.D. Bustos-Gajardo, S.I. Luarte-Martínez, S.A. Dubo Araya, R.S. Adasme Jeria" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F.D." "apellidos" => "Bustos-Gajardo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S.I." "apellidos" => "Luarte-Martínez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S.A." "apellidos" => "Dubo Araya" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R.S." "apellidos" => "Adasme Jeria" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0210569121002710" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medin.2021.10.006" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0210569121002710?idApp=WMIE" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572722001710?idApp=WMIE" "url" => "/21735727/0000004700000002/v2_202311091351/S2173572722001710/v2_202311091351/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:21 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy in relation to all-cause mortality among patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "73" "paginaFinal" => "83" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "X. Li, D. Liu, C. Liu, Z. Mao, Y. Liu, H. Yi, F. Zhou" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "X." "apellidos" => "Li" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "xiaomingli329@foxmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 2 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span>" "identificador" => "fn0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "Liu" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "dongs221@163.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span>" "identificador" => "fn0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Liu" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "chaoliu301@foxmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 3 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Z." "apellidos" => "Mao" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "maozhi@126.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Y." "apellidos" => "Liu" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span>" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Yi" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 6 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Zhou" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "feihuzhou301@126.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, PR China" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Emergency Medicine, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, PR China" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Medical School of Chinese PLA, PR China" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 3 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, PR China" "etiqueta" => "d" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Oxigenoterapia conservadora frente a liberal sobre la mortalidad total en pacientes en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: una revisión sistemática de ensayos controlados aleatorizados con metaanálisis y análisis secuencial de ensayos" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 3779 "Ancho" => 3341 "Tamanyo" => 882971 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0010" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Forest plots of comparison: conservative oxygen therapy versus liberal oxygen therapy. (a) Mortality at the longest follow-up; (b) mortality at 28 days; (c) mortality at 90 days; (d) ICU mortality.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hypoxemia refers to low oxygen tension arterial blood gases or partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>) in the blood, occurring when oxygen supplies fail to meet oxygen demands.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Hypoxemia is common and generally viewed as deleterious, especially in critically ill patients. Supplementary oxygen is the main strategy for the prevention and treatment of hypoxemia, either by invasive ventilation or non-invasive ventilation, and is wildly used in a hospital setting.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In clinical practice, providing supplemental oxygen for almost all acutely or critically ill patients, regardless of blood oxygen levels, is a longstanding cultural norm. However, this practice is not based on clinical evidence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3</span></a> A significant proportion of patients are exposed to an excessive oxygen administration. Undoubtedly, hypoxia can lead to cell injury and even death, and adequate oxygen supplementation is necessary,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> while hyperoxia may also cause cell, tissue or organ injury due to enhanced oxidative stress and inflammation.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,6</span></a> In recent years, more studies have investigated the relevant between hyperoxia and clinical outcomes in acutely or critically ill patients, while the results are contradictory. Some studies indicated that hyperoxia can be associated with poor clinical outcomes in different patients, such as patients with mechanically ventilation,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> traumatic brain injury (TBI),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> after resuscitation from cardiac arrest,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> and myocardial infarction,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> whilst other studies have not.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11–14</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the intensive care unit (ICU), oxygen therapy is administrated for most patients. A number of studies have focused on the fraction of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation in these patients, however, the management of oxygenation targets remains challenging in critically ill patients. Four previous systematic reviews all reached the conclusions that a liberal oxygen therapy strategy in adult patients admitted to the ICU could increase mortality and the number of adverse events compared with a conservative oxygen therapy strategy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15–18</span></a> However, two multicenter randomized control trials (RCTs) recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine involving ICU patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, or mechanical ventilation found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the conservative oxygen therapy groups and liberal oxygen therapy groups.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,20</span></a> Additionally, another similar RCT involving ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) found conservative oxygen therapy may increase 90-day mortality and mesenteric ischemic events.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As new high-quality RCTs have been published and the results are inconsistent with previous studies, we performed this systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate the benefits and harms of conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy in critically ill patients in the ICU.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Methods</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA statement) guidelines.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42021234555).</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Eligibility criteria</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) population: adult patients (aged 18 years or older) admitted to ICU; (2) patients were randomized to receive either a lower oxygenation target strategy (conservative oxygen therapy) or a higher oxygenation target strategy (liberal oxygen therapy), the aim of which was measured by any one of the following: fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>), PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>), or arterial oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>); (3) studies reported at least one of the following outcomes of interest: including 28-day all-cause mortality, 90-day all-cause mortality, or the longest follow-up all-cause mortality; (4) study type: RCT. Studies that only including patients with chronic respiratory diseases were excluded.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Search strategy and selection process</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library database, PubMed and EMBASE from inception through to February 1, 2021. We did not put any restrictions on publication language. The detail of search strategy for PubMed was provided in the Additional File 1. To find additional citations, the reference lists of the included studies and recent reviews were also screened. Two authors (X.L. and D.L.) independently screened titles and abstracts of all citations. Studies deemed potentially relevant were further assessed by reading full-text. Disagreements between two authors were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third author (F.Z.) when necessary.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Data extraction and risk of bias assessment</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Two authors (X.L. and D.L.) independently extracted the following information in a standard form: the first author, country, study center, publication year, participants (mean age of the patient, number of patients randomized, number of missing patients, number of patients finally analyzed, male percentage, type of population, inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria), details of intervention (types of oxygen intervention, FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, oxygenation target, oxygen delivery system, and duration of intervention), all clinical outcomes. Two authors (X.L. and D.L.) independently evaluated the risk of bias for each of these studies according to the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> The study would be classified as high risk of bias if any of bias domains were assessed as high risk. Disagreements between two authors were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third author (F.Z.) when necessary.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Outcomes</span><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality (at 28 days, 90 days, and the longest follow-up). The secondary outcomes included ICU all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation free days through day 28, new-onset pneumonia, new-onset infection, new-onset ARDS, new-onset atelectasis, and new-onset pneumothorax, new-onset mesenteric ischemia.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Statistical analysis</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by the Mantel–Haenszel method. For continuous outcomes, we used the Inverse Variance method to pool the mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs. Concerning potential heterogeneity, we used a random effect model in all analyses. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> statistic, which estimates the proportion of total variation across studies due to heterogeneity rather than chance.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> We performed funnel plots to assess publication bias by inspecting its asymmetry. And Egger’s test was also performed to detect publication bias.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a></p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Subgroup analyses for the primary outcome were performed according to oxygen delivery system (invasive mechanical ventilation, others) and duration of intervention (more than 48 h, less than 48 h). Sensitivity analyses for the primary outcomes included the following: using a fixed-effects model, excluding the study of specific diseases, excluding the study dividing groups by FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, and excluding the study conducted by Schjørring et al.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To assess the potential impact of the missing participants for the primary outcomes, we performed a best-worst scenario analysis, in which we assumed all missing participants in the conservative oxygen therapy group would survive, and all missing participants in the liberal oxygen therapy group would die. A worst-best scenario analysis was also performed, in which all missing participants in the conservative oxygen therapy group were assumed to die, and all missing participants in the liberal oxygen therapy group were assumed to survive. All above statistical analyses were performed by Review Manager (version 5.3) and STATA (version 14.0). If a two-sided <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> value was less than 0.05, the results were considered statistically significant.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">TSA was performed to control both type I and type II errors due to multiple testing and sparse data.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> TSA was done using TSA software (version 0.9 Beta, Copenhagen Trial Unit). We used a random effect model to construct the cumulative z curve. TSA was performed to maintain an overall 5% risk of a type I error. An anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) of 20.0% with a power of 90% was used to calculate the required information size to detect or reject an intervention effect. And the control event rate was adjusted according to the relevant rate of the liberal oxygen therapy group in our meta-analysis. When the cumulative <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Z</span>-curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary, reached the required information size, or entered the futility area, a firm evidence for accepting or rejecting the anticipated intervention effect may have been established, indicating that further trials may be superfluous. In contrast, if the boundary was not surpassed, and the required information size had not been reached, it indicated that more trials would be required.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27,28</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0135">Results</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">According to our search strategy, 5597 potentially studies were identified. After removing duplicates, 4291 studies were screened by titles and abstracts and 42 studies were further screened by reading full-text. Finally, ten studies involving 5429 adult patients admitted to the ICU with critical illness,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,29–31</span></a> septic shock,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> ARDS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a> out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a> traumatic brain injury (TBI),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34</span></a> severe acute stroke,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> or acute hypoxemic respiratory failure<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> were included in this meta-analysis (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>). The studies were published from 2015 to 2021. The number of participants ranged from 65 to 2888. Most studies were assessed as low risk of bias (see Additional file 2). Six studies only included patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation at randomization.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,21,30,32</span></a><span class="elsevierStyleSup">,</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34</span></a> All other studies randomized patients to liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy using oxygenation target, except for two studies using FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34,35</span></a> Details of the included individual studies characteristics were shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> and Appendix B Additional file 3.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0140">Mortality</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Data on mortality were available for all ten studies. The mortality in the conservative oxygen therapy group and the liberal oxygen therapy group were 38.4% (1034 of 2692 patients) and 38.7% (1055 of 2723 patients) at the longest follow-up, respectively. No significant difference was detected between two groups (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88–1.08; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.63; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 28%; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>a). Moderate heterogeneity was detected. There was no obvious asymmetry in funnel plots by visually inspecting, while Egger’s test indicated that publication bias may exist (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.014, see Additional file 4a). TSA result showed that the required information size was 4148. The cumulative Z curve reached the required information size and crossed the futility boundary, suggesting that a RRR of 20% or greater could be rejected (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>a).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The pooled results showed that a conservative oxygen therapy strategy could not decrease mortality compared with a liberal oxygen therapy strategy at 28 days (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.75–1.09; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.28; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 54%; 4245 participants, 6 studies, Fig. 2b), 90 days (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92–1.13; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.71; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 26%; 4705 participants, 6 studies, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>c), and in ICU (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53–1.37; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.51; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 68%; 906 participants, 4 studies, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>d). For 28-day all-cause mortality, TSA showed that the cumulative Z-curve did not cross any boundaries for benefit and harm, nor the futility boundary (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>b). For 90-day all-cause mortality, the cumulative Z curve reached the required information size and crossed the futility boundary (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>c).</p><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0145">Length of ICU stay and hospital stay, and mechanical ventilation-free days up to day 28</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Four studies reported the length of hospital stay<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,29,30,34</span></a> and six studies reported the length of ICU stay.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,29,30,32–34</span></a> The pooled results showed that oxygen therapy strategy could not affect the length of hospital stay (MD 0.74; 95% CI –1.48 to 2.95; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.51; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 38%; 1567 participants; see Additional file 5a) or ICU stay (MD 0.14; 95% CI –0.65 to 0.94; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.72; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 59%; 2121 participants; see Additional file 5b). Only three studies involving 1502 patients reported mechanical ventilation-free days up to day 28.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,30,32</span></a> No significant difference was detected between two groups (MD 0.25; 95% CI –1.78 to 2.27; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.81; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 59%; see Additional file 5c).</p></span></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0150">Adverse events</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Four studies reported the number of new-onset pneumonia.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21,29,32,34</span></a> Three studies reported the number of new-onset infection.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29,32,34</span></a> Four studies reported the number of new-onset ARDS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29,30,33,34</span></a> The data of new-onset atelectasis was available in two studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32,34</span></a> The data of new-onset pneumothorax was reported in two studies<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21,32</span></a> and the occurrence of mesenteric ischemia was reported in three studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21,32</span></a> There were no significant differences in terms of new-onset pneumonia (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.71–1.21; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.57; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 0; 1134 participants, see Additional file 5d), new-onset infection(RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.71–1.18; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.49; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 0; 933 participants, see Additional file 5e), new-onset ARDS(RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.65–1.75; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.81; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 0; 722 participants, see Additional file 5f), new-onset atelectasis(RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.34–1.70; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.50; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 75%; 499 participants, see Additional file 5 g), new-onset pneumothorax(RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.35–1.60; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.45; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 0; 635 participants, see Additional file 5 h), and the occurrence of mesenteric ischemia (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.43–2.82; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> = 0.83; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> = 46%; 3545 participants, see Additional file 5i) between two groups.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0155">Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">From the subgroup analyses of the primary outcomes, we found that oxygen delivery system (invasive mechanical ventilation, others) and duration of oxygen intervention (more than 48 h, less than 48 h) had no significant effect on all-cause mortality at 28 days, 90 days, and the longest follow-up. Sensitivity analyses did not alter the conclusion of the main analyses. The results of sensitivity analyses on missing data through the best-worst scenario analysis and the worst-best scenario analysis were consistent with the main analyses. Detailed results about subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses are presented in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a> and Appendix B Additional file 6.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0160">Discussion</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this meta-analysis for adult ICU patients, we found no beneficial or harmful effects of conservative oxygen therapy compared with liberal oxygen therapy. Both primary outcomes and secondary outcomes were comparable between two groups. TSA results indicated a RRR of 20% or greater could be rejected with respect to mortality at 90 days and at the longest follow-up, but in terms of mortality at 28 days, the required information size to detect or reject a RRR of 20% was not achieved.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our results were at variance with the results of previous meta-analyses on this topic. Damiani et al. and Helmerhorst et al. have conducted meta-analyses including observational studies and drawn a similar conclusion that hyperoxia may increase mortality in critically ill patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,16</span></a> The pooled results of study conducted by Barbateskovic et al. including 10 RCTs indicated that higher oxygen supplementation was associated with increased mortality and the incidence of serious adverse events. However, the authors were very uncertain about the results due to very low-certainty evidence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> Similarly, Hirase et al. have found conservative oxygen therapy administrated in the ICU could reduce mortality and new-onset non-respiratory organ failure compared to liberal oxygen therapy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> We updated the meta-analysis on this topic, including results from three recently published high-quality RCTs, none of which found that ICU patients would benefit from conservative oxygen therapy as compared to liberal oxygen therapy, which may support the fact that our conclusions differ from those previous meta-analyses.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21</span></a></p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">More studies have gained increasing interest in investigating the effects of exposure to hyperoxia, and have found that excessive oxygenation had deleterious properties in various pathophysiological processes.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> In a recent meta-analysis including 25 RCTs involving 16,037 acutely ill adults, Chu and colleagues found that liberal oxygen therapy was associated with higher mortality than conservative oxygen therapy with no improvement on other important clinical outcomes.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a> Our results showed no significant difference between the two groups. The different results between the two studies may be due to the following reasons-first, we only included studies involving critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. To our knowledge, both hypoxia and hyperoxia were independent risk factors of mortality in ICU patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">38,39</span></a> Patients assigned to the liberal oxygen therapy may be at higher risk of exposure to hyperoxia, while patients assigned to the conservative oxygen therapy may be at higher risk of exposure to hypoxia. Secondly, in our study, the mortality at the longest follow-up were 38.4% (1034 of 2692 patients) in the conservative oxygen therapy group and 38.7% (1055 of 2723 patients) in the liberal oxygen therapy group, while in the study conducted by Chu and colleagues, the mortality at the longest follow-up in the two groups were 9.5% (749 of 7857 patients) and 10.5% (828 of 7897 patients), respectively. It is reasonable to assume that the severity of disease in our study is higher. In addition, a significant proportion of patients in our study received invasive mechanical ventilation or had acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21,30,32–34</span></a> For these patients, a liberal oxygen therapy strategy to ensure adequate oxygen supplementation may be necessary.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The strengths of our study are as follows: First, we used a comprehensive, up-to-date search strategy, which have identified three recently published well designed RCTs. Moreover, all studies were published in recent years and most of them were assessed as low risk of bias. Second, the methodology used in this study was rigorous. TSA was performed to control the risk of random errors. A best-worst scenario analysis and a worst–best scenario analysis were performed to assess the potential impact of the missing participants for the primary outcomes. Limitations existed in this study must also be considered. As with previous meta-analyses on this topic, the primary limitation was that the definitions of liberal and conservative oxygen therapy varied widely from study to study. For example, some studies used a fixed FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, while others used a particular oxygenation target by measuring PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, SaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, or SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>. Considering the differences in patients’ conditions and lung function, higher FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> oxygen supplementation does not necessarily lead to higher tissue oxygen saturation, so it may be more reasonable to define liberal and conservative oxygen therapy by a particular oxygenation target. We conducted sensitive analyses by excluding two studies using a fixed FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> and we found the results were consistent with main analyses. Second, we only included studies involving ICU patients, while some studies included mixed populations with specific conditions, such as TBI and severe acute stroke. And duration of intervention also existed differences among included studies. Nonetheless, the results of subgroup analyses and sensitive analyses were consistent.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Oxygen administration is part of a routine treatment in the ICU. Although no beneficial or harmful effects of conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy were detected in this study, it is possible that different oxygen therapy strategies have effect on clinical outcomes. More studies are required to find an appropriate oxygen therapy strategy for ICU patients. Considering the complexity of the ICU patient's condition, oxygen therapy strategy in future studies should be designed according to patients’ conditions.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0165">Conclusion</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, no beneficial or harmful effects of conservative oxygen therapy were found compared with liberal oxygen therapy in adult ICU patients. Conservative oxygen therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality at 28 days, 90 days, and the longest follow-up. Other important clinical outcomes were also comparable between two groups.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0170">Authors' contributions</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">XML and DSL conceived of the study, participated in the design, collected the data, performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. CL participated in the design and performed statistical analyses. ZM helped to revise the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. YL collected the data and performed statistical analyses. HYY performed statistical analyses. FHZ conceived of the study, participated in the design and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0175">Funding</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0005">Innovation Research of Chinese PLA general hospital</span> (<span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs0005">CX19010</span>).</p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0010">Special Research of Military Medical Innovation</span> (<span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs0010">18CXZ026</span>).</p></span><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0180">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:22 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2007143" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Design" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Setting" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Participants" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Interventions" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Results" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719740" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719741" "titulo" => "Abbreviations" ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2007142" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Diseño" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Lugar" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0055" "titulo" => "Participantes" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0060" "titulo" => "Intervenciones" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0065" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0070" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719739" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Eligibility criteria" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Search strategy and selection process" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Data extraction and risk of bias assessment" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Outcomes" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Statistical analysis" ] 12 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Results" ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Mortality" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Length of ICU stay and hospital stay, and mechanical ventilation-free days up to day 28" ] ] ] 14 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Adverse events" ] 15 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses" ] 16 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 17 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] 18 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Authors' contributions" ] 19 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 20 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 21 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2021-04-19" "fechaAceptado" => "2021-08-22" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719740" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Conservative" 1 => "Liberal" 2 => "Oxygen therapy" 3 => "Intensive care unit" 4 => "Systematic review" 5 => "Meta-analysis" ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "clase" => "abr" "titulo" => "Abbreviations" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719741" "palabras" => array:15 [ 0 => "ARDS" 1 => "Cis" 2 => "FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>" 3 => "ICU" 4 => "OHCA" 5 => "PRISMA" 6 => "PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>" 7 => "RRs" 8 => "RCTs" 9 => "RRR" 10 => "SaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>" 11 => "SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>" 12 => "TSA" 13 => "TBI" 14 => "MDs" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1719739" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Conservador" 1 => "Liberal" 2 => "Oxigenoterapia" 3 => "Unidad de cuidados intensivos" 4 => "Revisión sistemática" 5 => "Metanálisis" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To evaluate the benefits and harmful effects of conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Design</span><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Setting</span><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ICU.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Participants</span><p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) were randomized to either a lower oxygenation target strategy (conservative oxygen therapy) or a higher oxygenation target strategy (liberal oxygen therapy) in the ICU.</p></span> <span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Interventions</span><p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Patients received different oxygenation target strategies.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Results</span><p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Ten studies involving 5429 adult patients admitted to the ICU were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed no decreased all-cause mortality at 28 days (RR 0.90; 95%CI 0.75–1.09; p = 0.28), 90 days (RR 1.02; 95%CI 0.92–1.13; p = 0.71) or longest follow-up (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.88–1.08; p = 0.63) among patients administered conservative oxygen therapy. Secondary outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The results of sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were consistent with the main analyses.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">No beneficial or harmful effects of conservative oxygen therapy were found compared to liberal oxygen therapy in relation to all-cause mortality among adult patients in the ICU. Conservative oxygen therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality at 28 days, 90 days or longest follow-up. Other important clinical outcomes were also comparable between the two groups.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Design" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Setting" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Participants" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Interventions" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Results" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Evaluar los beneficios y los daños de la oxigenoterapia conservadora frente a la liberal para los pacientes de la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI).</p></span> <span id="abst0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Diseño</span><p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Revisión sistemática y metanálisis.</p></span> <span id="abst0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Lugar</span><p id="spar0085" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI).</p></span> <span id="abst0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Participantes</span><p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Los pacientes adultos (de 18 años o más) fueron asignados al azar para recibir una estrategia de objetivo de oxigenación más baja (terapia de oxígeno conservadora) o una estrategia de objetivo de oxigenación más alta (terapia de oxígeno liberal) en la UCI.</p></span> <span id="abst0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Intervenciones</span><p id="spar0095" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Los pacientes recibieron diferentes estrategias de objetivos de oxigenación.</p></span> <span id="abst0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Resultados</span><p id="spar0100" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En este metanálisis se incluyeron diez estudios con 5429 pacientes adultos ingresados en la UCI. Los resultados agrupados no mostraron una disminución de la mortalidad total a los 28 días (RR 0,90; IC del 95%: 0,75 a 1,09; P = 0,28), 90 días (RR 1,02; IC del 95%: 0,92 a 1,13; P = 0,71) y el seguimiento más prolongado (RR 0,97; IC del 95%: 0,88 a 1,08; P = 0,63) para los pacientes tratados con oxigenoterapia conservadora. Los resultados secundarios fueron comparables entre los dos grupos. Los resultados de los análisis de sensibilidad y los análisis de subgrupos fueron consistentes con los análisis principales.</p></span> <span id="abst0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Conclusión</span><p id="spar0105" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">No se encontraron efectos beneficiosos o perjudiciales de la oxigenoterapia conservadora en comparación con la oxigenoterapia liberal sobre la mortalidad total entre los pacientes adultos en la UCI. La oxigenoterapia conservadora no redujo la mortalidad por todas las causas a los 28 días, a los 90 días ni en el seguimiento más prolongado. Otros resultados clínicos importantes también fueron comparables entre los dos grupos.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Diseño" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Lugar" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0055" "titulo" => "Participantes" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0060" "titulo" => "Intervenciones" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0065" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0070" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "etiqueta" => "1" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Xiaoming Li and Dongsheng Liu contributed equally to this work.</p>" "identificador" => "fn0005" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following are Supplementary data to this article:<elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0015"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0020"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0025"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0030"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary data" "identificador" => "sec0095" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:11 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2951 "Ancho" => 2508 "Tamanyo" => 422072 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flow diagram for the identification of eligible studies.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 3779 "Ancho" => 3341 "Tamanyo" => 882971 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0010" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Forest plots of comparison: conservative oxygen therapy versus liberal oxygen therapy. (a) Mortality at the longest follow-up; (b) mortality at 28 days; (c) mortality at 90 days; (d) ICU mortality.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 4175 "Ancho" => 2310 "Tamanyo" => 559931 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0015" "detalle" => "Figure " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Trial sequential analysis. (a–c) The cumulative <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Z</span> curve (complete blue line) was constructed using a random effect model. Etched red line shows conventional test boundary. Complete red line represents the trial sequential monitoring boundary. (a) TSA for mortality at the longest follow-up. A diversity-adjusted information size of 4148 patients were calculated on the basis of using alfa = 0.05 (two sided), beta = 0.10 (power 90%), an anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) of 20.0%, and a control event rate of 38.7%. The cumulative <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Z</span> curve crossed the futility boundary and reached the required information size. (b) TSA mortality at 28 days. A diversity-adjusted information size of 9367 patients was calculated on the basis of using alfa = 0.05 (two sided), beta = 0.10 (power 90%), an anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) of 20.0%, and a control event rate of 34.4%. The cumulative <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Z</span> curve did not cross any boundaries, and did not reach the required information size. c. TSA for mortality at 90 days. A diversity-adjusted information size of 3325 patients was calculated on the basis of using alfa = 0.05 (two sided), beta = 0.10 (power 90%), an anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) of 20.0%, and a control event rate of 40.0%. The cumulative <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Z</span> curve crossed the futility boundary and reached the required information size.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0020" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; SaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, arterial oxygen saturation of hemoglobin; FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>, peripheral oxygen saturation; ICU, intensive care unit; OHCA, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; TBI, traumatic brain injury; NA, not available.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Study \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Design and setting \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Participants (number/male/age)</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Interventions</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Intervention duration \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Follow-up duration \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Conservative group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Liberal group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Conservative group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Liberal group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Asfar 2017<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterSeptic shock \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">217/14066.3 ± 14.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">217/13767.8 ± 12.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 88% and 95% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 1.0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">24 h \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Barrot 2020<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterARDS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">99/6563.0 ± 15.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">102/6463.5 ± 14.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 55 and 70 mmHg; SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> was maintained at a level between 88 and 92% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 90 and 105 mmHg; SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> was maintained at a level of at least 96% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 days or until extubation \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Girardis 2016<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Single-centerMixed population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">216/12163 (51–74) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">218/12565 (52–76) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 70 and 100 mmHg or SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 94% and 98% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> values up to 150 mm Hg and an SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 97% and 100% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Until patient death or ICU discharge \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">60 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Jakkula 2018<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterAfter OHCA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">61/5059 ± 13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">59/4860 ± 14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 10 and 15 kPa (75–112.5 mmHg) or SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 95% and 98% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 20 and 25 kPa (150–187.5 mmHg) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">During the first 36 h in the ICU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 months \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Lång 2018<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterTBI \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">27/2343 ± 17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">38/3145 ± 13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 0.40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 0.70 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">14 days or until extubation \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 months \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Mackle 2020<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterMixed population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">484/30658.1 ± 16.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">481/30257.5 ± 16.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> between 90% and 97% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No specific measures limiting \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28 days or until ICU discharge \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 months \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Mazdeh 2015<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Single-centerAcute stroke \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">25/14NA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26/14NA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No supplemental oxygen \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 0.50 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12 h \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 months \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Panwar 2016<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterMixed population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">52/3262.4 ± 14.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">51/3362.4 ± 17.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 88–92% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> greater than or equal to 96% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Until extubation \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Schjørring 2021<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MulticenterAcute hypoxemic respiratory failure \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1441/NA70 (60–77) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1447/NA70 (60–77) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 60 mmHg \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PaO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> of 90 mmHg \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Until a maximum of 90 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yang 2019<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Single-centerMixed population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">78/5258 (46–72) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">90/5560 (46–68) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> target was 90–95% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SpO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> target was 96–100% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">14 days, death or ICU discharge \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28 days \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3333125.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Characteristics of included studies.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0025" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">No. of trials \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">No. of patients \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Risk ratio (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> value \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Heterogeneity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, % <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> value for <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">I</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " colspan="7" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Mortality at the longest follow-up</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " colspan="7" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Oxygen delivery system</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>IMV \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,21,30,32–34</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1874 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.03 [0.88, 1.20] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.74 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Others \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,29,31,35</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3541 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.86 [0.67, 1.10] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">47 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " colspan="7" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Duration of intervention</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>More than 48 h \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21,29–31,34</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4810 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.01 [0.88, 1.15] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.93 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Less than 48 h \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32,33,35</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">605 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.86 [0.71, 1.04] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.89 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Sensitivity analyses by using the fixed-effects model \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">10<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21,29–35</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5612 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.99 [0.92, 1.06] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.73 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Sensitivity analyses by excluding the study of specific diseases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21,29–32</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5179 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.97 [0.86, 1.11] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.69 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">48 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Sensitivity analyses by excluding the study dividing groups by FiO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19–21,29–33</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5299 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.97 [0.86, 1.09] \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.62 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Sensitivity analyses by excluding the study conducted by Schjørring et al. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,21,29–35</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2527 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n